Ms. Pomerantz distinguishes the current witness's work from Dr. Rocchio's, noting Dr. Rocchio was not testifying, implying they are both experts in a related field.
Ms. Pomerantz distinguishes the current witness's work from Dr. Rocchio's, noting Dr. Rocchio was not testifying, implying they are both experts in a related field.
DOJ-OGR-00016659.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a segment of a cross-examination. Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence related to Dr. Rocchio, while Mr. Pagliuca briefly interjects. The Court ultimately rules 'Overruled' on an unspecified objection or motion.
Entities connected to both Dr. Rocchio and witness
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship