Relationship Details
Unnamed Judge
→
Professional
→
Unnamed Counsel
Connected Entities
Entity A
Unnamed Judge
Type: person
Mentions: 11
Entity B
Unnamed Counsel
Type: person
Mentions: 10
Also known as: Unnamed Counsel (Q)
Evidence
The judge is directly addressing this counsel, explaining a ruling and why an objection related to their questioning was sustained.
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00017942.jpg
Unknown type
• 639 KB
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a judge's remarks during a hearing. The judge explains the reasoning for sustaining an objection related to a prior "Daubert" ruling on the scope of testimony about child grooming. The judge highlights a significant misunderstanding between opposing counsel, Mr. Pagliuca and another unnamed lawyer, but concludes that the violation of the ruling was not intentional.
Mutual Connections
Entities connected to both Unnamed Judge and Unnamed Counsel
MR. PAGLIUCA
(person)
Relationship Metadata
Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
5/10
Medium strength relationship
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:34
Entity Network Stats
Unnamed Judge
4 relationships
Unnamed Counsel
4 relationships
Mutual connections
1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship