The court instructs 'counsel and Mr. Epstein' to go to courtroom 17B together, and Mr. Weingarten is identified as speaking counsel in the transcript, implying he is Mr. Epstein's lawyer.
The Court asks if Mr. Weingarten represented Mr. Epstein in the Florida investigation. Mr. Weingarten denies direct representation in that specific case but states he is 'familiar with the records,' suggesting a professional connection or review of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000429.jpg
This court transcript, filed on July 16, 2019, documents a judge scheduling a continued detention hearing for a defendant, Mr. Epstein, on July 11. The court orders Mr. Epstein to remain detained and directs him and his counsel, Mr. Weingarten, to see Judge Berman in courtroom 17B immediately. The transcript also includes a clarification from Mr. Weingarten that there is no statutory rape charge due to a lack of penetration.
DOJ-OGR-00000417.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 16, 2019, where an attorney, Mr. Weingarten, provides context to the court about a prior investigation into Mr. Epstein. He describes a three-year investigation that began in Florida in 2005, involving both local and federal law enforcement, concerning allegations of prostitution. Mr. Weingarten claims that a significant portion of local law enforcement viewed the case as simple prostitution without coercion, while federal authorities held a 'contrary view,' leading to complex negotiations.
Entities connected to both MR. WEINGARTEN and Mr. Epstein
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship