Relationship Details

BOP Institutional GOVERNMENT

Connected Entities

Entity A
BOP
Type: organization
Mentions: 642
Also known as: SENTRY (BOP Inmate Management System), BOP-HSD, FBOP, MCC BOP, FBOP FCI Fort Dix, FBOP MCC New York, CO BOP, BOP HQ, BOPNET
Entity B
GOVERNMENT
Type: organization
Mentions: 2805
Also known as: Government of Australia, Government of the Republic of Cyprus, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Government Relations, PRC Government, US Government (The Americans), Government Exhibit, Office of Government Information Services, Government / USA, Orban Government, Palestinian government, IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE), Hamas Government, Saudi Arabian government, Orange County, California (Government), Netanyahu government, British Government, American government, Pakistan Government/Military, Canadian Government, Australian government, Government of Ecuador, New Zealand Government, Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Gov't (Government), Government / DOJ, American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals, United States of America (Government), US Government (implied by SDNY context)

Evidence

Court rules BOP is not part of the 'prosecutorial arm' in this specific context.

Government argues BOP was not involved in strategic decisions or joint investigation for discovery purposes.

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00022104.jpg

Court Order / Legal Filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) • 690 KB
View

This is page 8 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (USA v. Noel and Thomas). The court denies the defendant's (Thomas) motion to compel the government to produce evidence held by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), ruling that the BOP is not part of the prosecution team for Brady disclosure purposes. The document also outlines Thomas's argument that the conduct he is charged with was rampant within the BOP and acquiesced to by leadership.

DOJ-OGR-00022087.jpg

Legal Filing (Government Memorandum of Law/Opposition Brief) • 731 KB
View

This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on April 24, 2020, involving the prosecution of prison guards (specifically defendant Thomas) related to the events of August 9-10, 2019 (Jeffrey Epstein's suicide). The Government argues against Thomas's request for BOP records regarding staffing shortages and prior instances of falsified records, asserting that the BOP was not part of the prosecution team and therefore the Government is not obligated to search BOP files under discovery rules. The text cites legal precedents (U.S. v. Bryan, U.S. v. Volpe) to support the limitation of 'government' to only those agencies participating in the specific investigation.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both BOP and GOVERNMENT

unnamed defendant (person)
THOMAS (person)
Jeffrey Epstein (person)
Ms. Maxwell (person)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL (person)

BOP's Other Relationships

Detainee custodian Ms. Maxwell
Strength: 6/10 View
Employee THOMAS
Strength: 5/10 View
Professional Prosecution Team
Strength: 5/10 View
Professional separate agencies GOVERNMENT
Strength: 5/10 View
Custodial unnamed defendant
Strength: 5/10 View

GOVERNMENT's Other Relationships

Legal representative MAXWELL
Strength: 15/10 View
Legal representative Defense
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative defendant
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative Defense counsel
Strength: 12/10 View
Legal representative GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 12/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Institutional
Relationship Strength
6/10
Medium strength relationship
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 18:11
Last Updated
2025-11-20 20:03

Entity Network Stats

BOP 25 relationships
GOVERNMENT 178 relationships
Mutual connections 5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship