You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Relationship Details

MS. POMERANTZ Professional A. Farmer

Connected Entities

Entity A
MS. POMERANTZ
Type: person
Mentions: 906
Entity B
A. Farmer
Type: person
Mentions: 547

Evidence

Ms. Pomerantz is conducting a direct examination of A. Farmer, who is a witness in a legal case.

Ms. Pomerantz is acting as counsel and objects to questions posed to the witness, A. Farmer, suggesting she is representing Farmer's interests.

Ms. Pomerantz is an attorney who is objecting to questions posed to the witness, Ms. Farmer, suggesting she is representing or aligned with the witness's side.

Ms. Pomerantz makes objections during the questioning of A. Farmer, suggesting she is acting as Farmer's legal counsel.

Ms. Pomerantz is the attorney conducting the redirect examination of the witness, A. Farmer.

Ms. Pomerantz is conducting the direct examination of A. Farmer, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.

Ms. Pomerantz objects to a question directed at the witness, A. Farmer, suggesting she is likely representing or protecting the witness.

Ms. Pomerantz objects to a question directed at the witness, A. Farmer, suggesting she is likely representing or protecting the witness.

Ms. Pomerantz is conducting a direct examination of the witness, A. Farmer.

Ms. Pomerantz, an attorney, objects to a question posed to the witness A. Farmer, suggesting she may be representing the witness's interests.

Ms. Pomerantz is an attorney who is objecting to questions being asked of the witness, A. Farmer, suggesting she is representing or protecting the witness's interests.

Ms. Pomerantz acts as legal counsel for A. Farmer, making an objection during the cross-examination to protect her client.

Ms. Pomerantz is the attorney questioning the witness, A. Farmer.

Ms. Pomerantz conducts the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer.

Source Documents (13)

DOJ-OGR-00013619.jpg

legal document • 479 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.

DOJ-OGR-00016374.jpg

Unknown type • 507 KB
View

This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about potential inconsistencies in her statements to the government and her mother regarding an alleged sexual assault, specifically about feeling an erect penis and whether she said she was "not raped". Another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains the objections.

DOJ-OGR-00013781.jpg

legal document • 543 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness recounts what she told the FBI in 2006 about a massage given to her by someone named Maxwell, describing being asked to undress and being touched. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the testimony on the grounds that it is narrative.

DOJ-OGR-00016413.jpg

Unknown type • 406 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the end of witness A. Farmer's testimony. After attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger state they have no further questions, the court excuses the witness. Ms. Pomerantz, representing the government, then calls the next witness, David Mulligan, to the stand.

DOJ-OGR-00016252.jpg

legal document • 524 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, questions a witness named Annie Farmer, who reads aloud an entry she wrote on January 7, 1996. The entry details her feelings after a significant trip to New York, expressing a sense of depression upon returning home, feeling isolated from friends, and being eager to start college.

DOJ-OGR-00013754.jpg

Unknown type • 542 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on the witness's awareness of the legal consequences of filing a fraudulent claim, specifically the penalties of perjury. An objection by another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, to a question about the witness's testimony is sustained by the court.

DOJ-OGR-00016411.jpg

Unknown type • 516 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer (also called Annie). Attorney Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness about what Jeffrey Epstein did to her in bed. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the questions, leading to rulings and guidance from the judge (THE COURT) on the proper form of questioning.

DOJ-OGR-00013739.jpg

legal document • 519 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning, conducted by Ms. Menninger, centers on a foot massage involving a Mr. Epstein and whether Ms. Farmer previously told the government she did not remember it being sexualized. Ms. Farmer clarifies that while she felt it was 'sexualized to some degree,' it did not involve inappropriate touching, and the exchange is marked by several sustained objections from another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz.

DOJ-OGR-00016370.jpg

Unknown type • 499 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a massage performed by someone named Ghislaine, with the witness stating her entire breast was exposed and refuting the suggestion that the massage was not explicitly sexual. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger are present, with the former making objections and the latter conducting the examination.

DOJ-OGR-00016292.jpg

legal document • 534 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding a flight Farmer took alone in September 2019. The witness confirms the flight and explains it was to visit family, while another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes objections on the witness's behalf.

DOJ-OGR-00013709.jpg

Unknown type • 478 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on how the witness determined a trip occurred in April 1996, revealing they used memory fragments of the movie 'Primal Fear' and prom, and cross-referenced them with online information and friends' recollections. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the line of questioning, citing 'mischaracterization'.

DOJ-OGR-00016257.jpg

Unknown type • 498 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named A. Farmer (also called Annie). The witness states she spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone two or three times and saw him in person in New Mexico in April 1996. A photograph of the witness from the spring of 1996, showing her getting ready for prom, is identified and admitted into evidence as Government Exhibit 102.

DOJ-OGR-00016335.jpg

Unknown type • 447 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the accuracy of the witness's memory regarding a trip to Thailand that occurred 25 years prior, which the witness recalled by associating it with their birthday. The transcript also records a legal objection by Ms. Pomerantz, which was overruled by the court, and mentions that the witness had previously discussed the trip dates with a Mr. Baker.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both MS. POMERANTZ and A. Farmer

Ms. Moe (person)
Questioner (person)
Questioner (Q.) (person)
MS. MENNINGER (person)
The government (organization)

MS. POMERANTZ's Other Relationships

Legal representative Dr. Rocchio
Strength: 13/10 View
Opposing counsel Ms. Sternheim
Strength: 12/10 View
Opposing counsel MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 11/10 View
Professional Mr. Flatley
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 10/10 View

A. Farmer's Other Relationships

Legal representative MS. MENNINGER
Strength: 14/10 View
Legal representative MS. POMERANTZ
Strength: 10/10 View
Siblings Maria
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional MS. MENNINGER
Strength: 10/10 View
Acquaintance Epstein
Strength: 10/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
10/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
13
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:14
Last Updated
2025-11-20 17:52

Entity Network Stats

MS. POMERANTZ 87 relationships
A. Farmer 216 relationships
Mutual connections 5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship