Relationship Details

This document is page 801 from a 2005 legal opinion regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation (349 F.Supp.2d 765). The text discusses the 'discretionary function' exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the court's finding that this exception bars claims against Saudi Royals Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, who were accused of donating to charities linked to al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was likely part of a Congressional document production.

This document is a page from a Federal Supplement (legal opinion) regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11 attacks. It discusses motions to dismiss filed by Saudi defendants, specifically Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, as well as the National Commercial Bank, in cases alleging they provided material support to al Qaeda. The text details procedural history involving the transfer of cases between the District of Columbia and the Southern District of New York, and mentions a $4.5 billion claim by insurance companies.

This document is page 793 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and rules that alleged money laundering or charitable contributions by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki do not constitute 'commercial activity' that would strip them of sovereign immunity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.