Relationship Details

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying and visiting a 'crack house' in Georgia. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, frequently objects and instructs the witness not to answer the questions.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.

This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.

This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. It captures a legal dispute between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold instructs his client not to answer a question based on attorney-client privilege, leading to a heated argument about procedural rules and 'speaking objections'.