Relationship Details

This legal document is a response filed by defendant Jeffrey Epstein's attorney to a 'Motion for Protective Order' submitted on behalf of a state's witness, Jane Doe No. 1. Epstein's counsel refutes the claim that serving a deposition subpoena constituted 'continuous and systematic harassment' and denies allegations of misconduct by any agent. The response also highlights a legal conflict between two attorneys, Theodore Leopold and Jeffrey Herman, who are both claiming to represent Jane Doe No. 1 in a separate civil case.

This is a legal filing (Response to Motion for Protective Order) from the 2006 criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Epstein's defense denies allegations of harassment regarding the service of a subpoena to witness Jane Doe No. 1 and denies knowledge of an agent visiting her workplace. The document highlights a legal dispute between attorneys Theodore Leopold and Jeffrey Herman, both of whom claim to represent Jane Doe No. 1 in a separate civil proceeding.