Relationship Details

Jane Doe 1000 Accuser accused JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN

Connected Entities

Entity A
Jane Doe 1000
Type: person
Mentions: 108
Entity B
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
Type: person
Mentions: 666

Evidence

Plaintiff alleges Decedent committed sexual offenses against her in New York and Florida.

Plaintiff bringing sexual abuse claims against Decedent

Plaintiff suing Estate regarding 'alleged abuse of Plaintiff'.

Source Documents (3)

024.pdf

Legal Correspondence (Pre-motion Letter) • 76.6 KB
View

This document is a letter from Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney for the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate, to Judge Lorna G. Schofield, dated January 24, 2020. The letter requests a pre-motion conference to move for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Jane Doe 1000. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims regarding alleged abuse in 1999 are time-barred by the statutes of limitations in New York and Florida, do not qualify for tolling under the Child Victims Act or criminal proceeding statutes, and that punitive damages cannot be legally awarded against a decedent's estate.

026.pdf

Legal Filing (Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order) • 75.8 KB
View

This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff requests broad discovery including flight logs, financial records, Amazon history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators, while the Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope strictly to the Plaintiff's alleged abuse. The document outlines proposed deadlines for document requests, HIPAA releases, and expert discovery, noting significant disagreements between the parties on the timing of these phases.

061.pdf

Legal Document (Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order) • 26 KB
View

This is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed in the US District Court (SDNY) on June 12, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agreed to stay (pause) the lawsuit for 60 days to allow the Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. If the claim is resolved through the program, the Plaintiff agrees to discontinue the legal action with prejudice.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both Jane Doe 1000 and JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN

Darren K. Indyke (person)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL (person)

Jane Doe 1000's Other Relationships

Legal representative Indyke
Strength: 3/10 View
Client Sigrid S. McCawley
Strength: 2/10 View
Victim abuser Jeffrey Epstein
Strength: 2/10 View
Legal representative Darren K. Indyke
Strength: 2/10 View
Legal representative Sigrid McCawley
Strength: 2/10 View

JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN's Other Relationships

Executor Darren K. Indyke
Strength: 53/10 View
Executor RICHARD D. KAHN
Strength: 49/10 View
Executor of estate Darren K. Indyke
Strength: 8/10 View
Executor of estate RICHARD D. KAHN
Strength: 8/10 View
Professional CBP OFFCR-C
Strength: 7/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Accuser accused
Relationship Strength
3/10
Weak relationship, limited evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-12-26 04:15
Last Updated
2025-12-26 04:47

Entity Network Stats

Jane Doe 1000 21 relationships
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN 66 relationships
Mutual connections 2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship