The document states the defendant believes 'her attorneys would be more capable of discovering' information and have 'more in-depth knowledge of the case'.
DOJ-OGR-00005252.jpg
This legal document is page 3 of a court filing from October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the court's reasoning for denying a defendant's request for attorney-conducted voir dire. The defendant argued for it based on significant pretrial publicity and the case's sensitive nature, but the court concluded that court-conducted voir dire is sufficient to ensure fairness and prevent potential prejudice, citing legal precedents.
Entities connected to both defendant and attorneys
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship