Email correspondence within USANYS context
Exchange of meeting acceptance regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
Colleagues discussing legal strategy and drafting letters regarding witness orders.
Exchange of evidence materials and status updates regarding the Epstein/Maxwell case.
Correspondence regarding a discovery deadline in the Epstein case.
Correspondence regarding a legal oral argument at the Second Circuit.
Email correspondence regarding US v. Epstein case
Exchange of read receipt regarding legal search materials and privilege review.
Exchanging calendar invites regarding legal proceedings (bail hearing)
Discussion of returning evidence/photos and 'progress on the case'.
Exchange regarding a 'case list' and agreement to chat later.
Exchange of Grand Jury materials.
Email correspondence sharing court orders and logistics regarding a federal case.
Email correspondence exchanging draft legal documents ('As promised').
EFTA00030590.pdf
An email exchange from March 2011 where one individual thanks another for returning photos via FedEx. The correspondence references 'progress on the case', suggesting a legal investigation context, and notes the photos were sent from Florida.
EFTA00014876.pdf
An email dated November 23, 2021, discussing a draft letter regarding the witness order for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (referred to as GM in the attachment). The sender explains their strategy for the witness list order, prioritizing the 'most likely' order over the 'order of proof' to reflect a realistic trial timeline. The document includes a Bates stamp EFTA00014876.
EFTA00026649.pdf
This document is an email notification dated July 10, 2019, indicating that an unidentified sender accepted a calendar invitation with the subject 'Epstein bail hearing'. The sender and recipient identities are redacted. The date corresponds to the period immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
EFTA00031217.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from July and August 2020 between legal teams (likely prosecution and defense) regarding the status of evidence in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It details the transfer of digital forensic materials, including thumb drives containing specific device extractions identified by 'NYC' numbers. Significant technical issues are discussed, including 71,000 'zero byte' (empty) files and two servers with physically failed drives requiring specialist recovery at HQ.
EFTA00032568.pdf
This document is an email dated July 1, 2019, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line refers to a 'prospective draft bail appeal or appeal response letter' for 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), dated June 25, 2019. The email body simply states 'As promised,' indicating the transmission of requested legal drafts shortly before Epstein's arrest.
EFTA00027292.pdf
An email dated April 13, 2021, with the subject 'PC.pdf'. The sender (redacted) sends an attachment described as a 'case list as of a few months ago' to a recipient (redacted) and suggests chatting later. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00027292.
EFTA00018380.pdf
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email includes two attachments related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case: a 'RTC' (likely Request to Charge) document and a verdict sheet, indicating trial preparation activities.
EFTA00028083.pdf
This document is an email notification dated July 17, 2019, indicating the acceptance of a meeting or conference call with the subject 'Conference: Jeffrey Epstein'. The identities of the sender and recipient are redacted. The date corresponds to the period following Epstein's July 2019 arrest, suggesting this communication pertains to legal or administrative matters involving his case.
EFTA00028075.pdf
This document is an email header dated July 31, 2019, indicating that a redacted individual accepted a calendar invitation or deadline with the subject 'Accepted: Epstein discovery deadline'. The email was sent with 'Normal' importance and contained an unnamed attachment. The participants' identities are obscured by redactions.
EFTA00019533.pdf
This document is a redacted email notification dated January 9, 2019, with the subject line 'Accepted: Epstein Oral Argument-- Second Circuit'. It appears to be an automated response or calendar acceptance related to legal proceedings involving Epstein at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The identities of the sender and recipient are obscured.
EFTA00014329.pdf
This document is an automated email read receipt dated June 10, 2019, confirming that a message with the subject 'US v. Epstein' was read. The correspondence involves a contractor for the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), occurring shortly before Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
EFTA00027843.pdf
This document is an email read receipt dated February 7, 2020. It confirms that a message with the subject 'Read: RE: Epstein search materials for upload and privilege review' was read. The recipient is identified as a contractor for the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00013875.pdf
This document is an email dated June 29, 2008, sent to a recipient at USAFLS (likely the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida). The subject line is empty, but the email includes an attachment titled 'GRAND_JURY_PRESENTATION_PART_III.docx', suggesting the transfer of legal documents related to a grand jury proceeding. The identities of the sender and recipient, as well as the email body, are redacted.
EFTA00020392.pdf
This document is an email dated July 10, 2020, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email attaches a scheduling order for Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming detention/bail hearing and discusses logistics, specifically noting that the order contains dial-in information for public audio access which can be provided to victims if requested.
Entities connected to both Redacted Sender and Redacted Recipient
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship