Relationship Details

This document is page 82 of a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as an exhibit (A-5925) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The text captures a legal argument by Ms. Davis referencing the 'Parse' case (likely United States v. Parse) and a letter from juror Catherine Conrad. The argument focuses on the legal distinction between 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' in the context of tax evasion and conspiracy counts, and how the jury's split verdict demonstrates a lack of prejudice and a deliberate decision-making process. This appears to be a citation of precedent used during post-trial motions in the Maxwell trial.

This document is a page from a legal filing by Zuckerman Spaeder LLP addressed to Judge William H. Pauley, III, regarding the sentencing of David Parse. It disputes the Probation Office's sentencing guidelines which calculated a tax loss of $1.5 billion and a prison range of 292-365 months. The document includes a significant footnote quoting a letter from Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad) to AUSA Okula, detailing her hesitation in convicting Parse on conspiracy charges.