Parties in the lawsuit Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz.
Case title: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case is Edwards vs. Dershowitz; Dershowitz called him sleazy.
Subject line: 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz'
Case style: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case style: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Edwards is questioning Dershowitz; Dershowitz accuses Edwards of falsely denying receiving a letter.
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz (Case Title)
Filed suits and countersuits against each other; settled on April 8, 2016.
Case style 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz'
Mention of defamation suits and countersuits between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632.jpg
This document is a page from a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, likely part of a House Oversight review. It contains a transcript of Alan Dershowitz's deposition where he vehemently denies ever meeting or touching Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) and denies witnessing Jeffrey Epstein abuse anyone. An attorney, Ms. McCawley, interrupts to object when Dershowitz mentions David Boies and potential settlement discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022147.jpg
This document appears to be a scanned excerpt from a book (Chapter 65, page 250) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. It recounts an episode of 'Law & Order: SVU' featuring a character named Jordan who is modeled after Jeffrey Epstein, describing a plot where the character claims to be the victim of a minor. The text then transitions to October 2015, describing Alan Dershowitz appearing in a Florida courthouse regarding defamation lawsuits involving attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015630.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal response in the defamation case *Edwards v. Dershowitz* (CACE 15-000072). The filing argues against Dershowitz's motion for confidentiality, citing previous orders by Judge Marra in a federal CVRA case. The text explicitly mentions allegations of sexual abuse by Dershowitz against Ms. Giuffre and asserts that previous court orders allow for these factual details to be presented if properly supported.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015622.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014094.jpg
This document is a page from a legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. It details Dershowitz's public denial of sexual abuse allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre) and his claims on Fox Business that he possesses records proving his innocence and her dishonesty. The text outlines the timeline of legal filings in early January 2015, including Dershowitz's motion to intervene and Edwards' subsequent request for the production of the specific exculpatory records Dershowitz claimed to hold.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022170.jpg
These pages, likely from the book 'Filthy Rich' and marked as House Oversight evidence, detail Alan Dershowitz's defense of his legal work for Jeffrey Epstein and his conflict with attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The text describes a protest against Dershowitz at Johns Hopkins University and his assertion that he is proud of the 'good deal' he secured for Epstein. It concludes with the details of an April 8, 2016 settlement where Edwards and Cassell withdrew sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz, and Dershowitz withdrew his claims of unethical conduct against them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015638.jpg
This document is page 18 of 20 from a court filing in the case 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No. CACE 15-000072), specifically a response to a motion regarding the confidentiality of court records. It contains the signature blocks and contact information for the Utah Attorney General's office, plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, and a counsel list including Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.jpg
This document is an email from Mary E. Pirrotta to Lindsay Isaac (at Turner) dated January 22, 2015. It provides requested legal documents, specifically a complaint for Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Edwards vs. Dershowitz) and a letter from Mr. Scarola addressed to The Duke of York. The document bears Bates stamps BE-000029 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014096.jpg
This document is page 6 of a Motion to Compel Production of Documents filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz failed to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3, despite claiming to the media he possessed such proof, and failed to file a privilege log while asserting blanket privileges. The motion requests the court to order immediate production of materials, declare privileges waived due to the lack of a log, and award attorneys' fees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014098.jpg
This document is a 'Counsel List' exhibit filed on March 24, 2015, in the Florida Southern District Court (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM), related to the state case 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No.: CACE 15-000072). It lists contact information for Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. of the law firm Cole Scott & Kissane P.A., identifying him as the attorney for the Defendant (Dershowitz). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015628.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal response in the case of Edwards v. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It details a motion filed on December 30, 2014, by Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) and Jane Doe No. 4 to join the case as victims under the CVRA, explicitly alleging that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked Giuffre to Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew for sexual purposes while she was a minor. The text also notes Dershowitz's subsequent aggressive media response, in which he called Giuffre a 'serial liar' and the opposing attorneys 'sleazy' and 'unprofessional.'
Entities connected to both Bradley Edwards and ALAN DERSHOWITZ
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship