Relationship Details

GOVERNMENT Professional Epstein's counsel

Connected Entities

Entity A
GOVERNMENT
Type: organization
Mentions: 2805
Also known as: Government of Australia, Government of the Republic of Cyprus, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Government Relations, PRC Government, US Government (The Americans), Government Exhibit, Office of Government Information Services, Government / USA, Orban Government, Palestinian government, IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE), Hamas Government, Saudi Arabian government, Orange County, California (Government), Netanyahu government, British Government, American government, Pakistan Government/Military, Canadian Government, Australian government, Government of Ecuador, New Zealand Government, Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Gov't (Government), Government / DOJ, American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals, United States of America (Government), US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Entity B
Epstein's counsel
Type: person
Mentions: 25

Evidence

The government's actions gave the misimpression to victims and the public that they had colluded with Epstein's counsel to keep the NPA secret.

The government's actions gave the misimpression to victims and the public that they had colluded with Epstein's counsel to keep the NPA secret.

The document states that the government's actions gave the misimpression that it had colluded with Epstein's counsel to keep the NPA secret from victims.

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00004610.jpg

Unknown type • 614 KB
View

This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed on May 25, 2021, analyzing the government's handling of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). OPR concludes that while the decision to delay notifying victims about the NPA in 2008 was not professional misconduct, the government's lack of transparency and poor communication led victims to feel ignored and ill-treated. This conduct created a public misimpression of collusion with Epstein's counsel and undermined confidence in the agreement.

DOJ-OGR-00021187.jpg

Unknown type • 1.06 MB
View

This document is an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzing the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically its communication with victims. OPR concludes that while no professional misconduct occurred, there were significant failures, including misleading letters sent by the FBI and poor judgment by State Attorney Acosta in not ensuring victims were notified of a plea hearing. These actions, combined with a lack of transparency, led to victims feeling ignored and frustrated, created a misimpression of collusion with Epstein's counsel, and ultimately damaged public confidence in the Department of Justice.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both GOVERNMENT and Epstein's counsel

Epstein (person)

GOVERNMENT's Other Relationships

Legal representative MAXWELL
Strength: 15/10 View
Legal representative Defense
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative defendant
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative Defense counsel
Strength: 12/10 View
Legal representative GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 12/10 View

Epstein's counsel's Other Relationships

Adversarial professional USAO
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative identified victims
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative Acosta
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative USAO
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative GOVERNMENT
Strength: 5/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
7/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:46
Last Updated
2025-11-20 17:13

Entity Network Stats

GOVERNMENT 178 relationships
Epstein's counsel 14 relationships
Mutual connections 1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship