Relationship Details

This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and 'Proposed Rule 43.1(b)' regarding court procedures when a victim is not notified of proceedings. It argues that conducting trials or sentencings without notifying the victim violates the CVRA. The document bears the name of Epstein attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal reference material or evidence regarding the violation of Epstein's victims' rights under the CVRA during the congressional investigation.

This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.