The document details a rule issued by the Board that imposes posting requirements on employers, and discusses comments from employers opposing the rule.
The Board's rule imposes a requirement on employers to post notices for their employees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022316.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Entities connected to both Employers and The Board (NLRB)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship