Relationship Details

Appellant Legal representative USAO-SDNY

Connected Entities

Entity A
Appellant
Type: person
Mentions: 23
Entity B
USAO-SDNY
Type: person
Mentions: 0

Evidence

USAO-SDNY charged Appellant under Count Six

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021844.jpg

Legal Brief / Court Filing (Appellate) • 585 KB
View

This document is page 15 (labeled 20 of 51 in the header) of a legal appellate brief filed on November 1, 2024. It argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) covering the 2001-2007 period should have prevented the USAO-SDNY from charging the Appellant (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell) for conduct between 2001-2004. The text cites legal precedents (*Annabi*, *Alessi*, *Papa*) regarding whether plea agreements bind other US Attorney Offices and argues the Appellant was improperly denied an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant's Other Relationships

Legal representative USAO-SDNY
Strength: 6/10 View
Adversarial GOVERNMENT
Strength: 5/10 View
Professional John M. Leventhal
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative Annabi
Strength: 5/10 View

USAO-SDNY's Other Relationships

Not notified approved USAO-SDFL
Strength: 1/10 View
Defendant prosecutor MAXWELL
Strength: 1/10 View
Administrative supervisory Nathaniel Gamble II
Strength: 1/10 View
Administrative Nathaniel Gamble II
Strength: 1/10 View
Legal representative Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Strength: 1/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Legal representative
Relationship Strength
1/10
Weak relationship, limited evidence
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 12:50

Entity Network Stats

Appellant 5 relationships
USAO-SDNY 6 relationships
Mutual connections 0

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship