The author describes Jean as 'only an employee', implying that Alberto is his employer or supervisor, likely through the company Cabinet Pinto.
The author describes Jean as 'only an employee', implying that Alberto is his employer or supervisor, likely through the company Cabinet Pinto.
The sender identifies Jean as 'only an employee', implying Alberto is his employer or superior within the context of the project and the company Cabinet Pinto.
DOJ-OGR-00030590.jpg
This is a letter dated July 26, 2017, from an unnamed client to a contractor named Alberto. The client forcefully rejects Alberto's resignation from a significantly delayed 'big house Island project', which was originally promised for the previous Christmas. The author appeals to their personal friendship and Alberto's professional duty, stating that the ultimate responsibility lies with him and his company, Cabinet Pinto, not his employee, Jean.
DOJ-OGR-00030586.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 26, 2017, in which the author rejects the resignation of their contractor, Alberto, from a significantly delayed 'island project'. The author appeals to a close, 'family-like' relationship to insist that Alberto is personally obligated to complete the house, which remains in a state of disrepair despite promises of completion by the previous Christmas and the end of July. The author holds Alberto personally responsible over his employee, Jean, or the company, Cabinet Pinto.
Entities connected to both Alberto Garutti and Jean
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship