Relationship Details

This document is a page from a legal brief regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (2012 WL 257568). It argues that the District Court improperly dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against several financial defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, for allegedly providing material support to al-Qaeda. The text cites various legal precedents to argue that the ATA should be construed broadly to cut off funding sources to terrorist groups. Although the prompt mentions Epstein, the document text refers strictly to 9/11 litigation, though the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' suggests it may have been part of a broader congressional investigation.