Relationship Details

Ms. Comey Professional your Honor

Connected Entities

Entity A
Ms. Comey
Type: person
Mentions: 1419
Entity B
your Honor
Type: person
Mentions: 807

Evidence

Ms. Comey addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' while presenting her legal argument.

Ms. Comey, an attorney, addresses the presiding judge ('your Honor') respectfully within the court proceeding.

Ms. Comey, an attorney, addresses the presiding judge ('your Honor') respectfully within the court proceeding.

Ms. Comey, an attorney, addresses the judge as "Your Honor" while presenting evidence.

Ms. Comey formally addresses the judge as 'your Honor' in a court proceeding.

Source Documents (4)

DOJ-OGR-00018260.jpg

Unknown type • 465 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding three pieces of evidence labeled Government Exhibits 238, 239, and 240. Mr. Parkinson identifies the exhibits as depicting the first floor and north side of a building.

DOJ-OGR-00018978.jpg

Unknown type • 513 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers authenticates their pilot logbook, confirming it is an accurate record kept in the regular course of their duties. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit the logbook into evidence as a sealed exhibit (662) and a redacted public version (662-R), which the court accepts without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.

DOJ-OGR-00017409.jpg

Unknown type • 611 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. In the transcript, a speaker identified as Ms. Comey stipulates that several government exhibits (11 through 16) are true and correct certified copies of birth certificates. These certificates were reported to various government agencies in New York, Rhode Island, Missouri, Sacramento County (California), and Massachusetts.

DOJ-OGR-00018115.jpg

Unknown type • 634 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a legal debate between Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell over the admissibility of a photograph as evidence. Ms. Comey argues for showing a closeup to establish its placement on a bookshelf, while Mr. Everdell contends it must be shown in the wider, non-prejudicial context of other nonsexual photos to avoid misleading the jury.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both Ms. Comey and your Honor

Ms. Moe (person)
MS. POMERANTZ (person)
MR. ROHRBACH (person)
Mr. Everdell (person)
MS. MENNINGER (person)
MR. PAGLIUCA (person)
unnamed attorney (person)

Ms. Comey's Other Relationships

Legal representative The Court
Strength: 18/10 View
Opposing counsel MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 15/10 View
Opposing counsel Mr. Everdell
Strength: 13/10 View
Opposing counsel MS. MENNINGER
Strength: 13/10 View
Representative The government
Strength: 12/10 View

your Honor's Other Relationships

Professional MS. MENNINGER
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Ms. Moe
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Mr. Everdell
Strength: 9/10 View
Professional MR. PAGLIUCA
Strength: 8/10 View
Professional MR. COHEN
Strength: 7/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
9/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
4
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:47
Last Updated
2025-11-20 16:57

Entity Network Stats

Ms. Comey 127 relationships
your Honor 22 relationships
Mutual connections 7

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship