Relationship Details

This document is a page from a Government filing opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions of dollars to her spouse through trusts over the last five years, noting she brought over $20 million to the marriage while he brought only $200,000. The text highlights her lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding her net worth and the ownership of her New Hampshire residence.

This document is page 16 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request for release, citing a 'lack of candor' and 'woefully incomplete' financial representations made to Pretrial Services. Consequently, the Court concludes the Defendant remains a flight risk and rejects the proposed $28.5 million bail package.

This court document outlines the Government's argument regarding the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application, focusing on her financial assets and lack of candor. It alleges she transferred the majority of her wealth (over $20 million brought to the marriage versus her husband's $200k) into trusts for her spouse to hide assets, including funds used to buy her New Hampshire hideout. The text highlights discrepancies between her actual wealth and what she disclosed to Pretrial Services.

This document is page 28 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on December 18, 2020. The Government argues against granting the defendant's bail package, asserting that she has transferred the majority of her wealth to her husband over the last five years, meaning any bond posted by him would essentially be her own money, reducing the 'moral suasion' preventing flight. The document cites legal precedent (United States v. Boustani) rejecting a 'two-tiered bail system' that favors wealthy defendants who can afford private security.

This document is Page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated March 9, 2021, arguing that the District Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Third Bail Motion because an appeal regarding her Second Bail Motion is already pending with the Second Circuit. The text details the defendant's offers to renounce French and British citizenship and sequester spousal assets to secure bail, reiterating the court's previous finding that she poses a significant flight risk.

This document is a Government filing from December 2020 opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions into trusts for her spouse over the preceding five years. The text highlights a financial discrepancy where she brought over $20 million to the marriage while her spouse contributed only $200,000, and notes her 'lack of candor' with Pretrial Services regarding property ownership.

This document is page 11 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's motion for bail, citing that proposed conditions, including monitorship, cannot reasonably assure her appearance in court. The judge notes that despite a substantial bail package, the Defendant retains access to significant assets ($450,000 for living expenses plus valuable jewelry/chattels) that could facilitate flight and evasion of prosecution.