Relationship Details

This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. An attorney argues during a bail hearing, dismissing the government's evidence concerning a threat from a 'Ms. Moe' as irrelevant 'spin' not connected to their client, 'Ms. Maxwell'. The attorney then pivots to the legal standard for pretrial release, quoting statute 3142 to argue for release under the least restrictive conditions.

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, in which an attorney argues that the evidence against an individual named Ghislaine is insufficient to prove criminal enticement. The attorney contends that her role in arranging travel was merely a 'ministerial function,' akin to a travel agent, and did not involve the persuasion or inducement required by the statute. To support this claim, the attorney cites the 2008 Second Circuit case, United States v. Joseph, as a legal precedent.

This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, where an attorney argues that their client, Ghislaine, should not be convicted of enticement. The attorney contends that her act of arranging travel was merely a 'ministerial function,' akin to a travel agent's work, and lacked the necessary element of persuasion or inducement required by the statute. The argument is supported by citing the 2008 Second Circuit precedent in 'United States v. Joseph'.