DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
1 MB
Extraction Summary
11
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
6
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1 MB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant/Party in case |
Named in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
|
| MR. GAIR | Counsel/Examiner |
Participating in the inquiry/examination, addressing the Court and questioning 'The Answerer'.
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Court |
Presiding over the inquiry, making statements, asking questions, and managing the proceedings.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as having a prior conversation with 'The Answerer' regarding their finances and ability to hire a lawyer; a...
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Unknown |
Presented a financial affidavit which she received from Ms. Conrad.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness/Party involved |
Provided a financial affidavit, left a voice mail message stating she would not attend the hearing, and is the subjec...
|
| Catherine Conrad | Witness/Party involved |
Identified as the speaker in the voice mail message, same person as Ms. Conrad.
|
| MR. OKULA | Counsel/Examiner |
Participating in the inquiry/examination, addressing the Court.
|
| The Answerer | Witness/Defendant (person being questioned) |
The individual responding to questions from counsel and the court regarding their finances and prior interactions wit...
|
| Court's deputy | Deputy |
Had a conversation with Ms. Conrad prior to her voice mail message.
|
| Client of questioning counsel | Client |
Referred to by 'The Answerer' as someone against whom a guilty verdict was rendered.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government agency |
Plaintiff in the legal case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | Company |
Transcribing the court proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2011-12-20
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
Court
2012-02-15
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
Court
Relationships (6)
Ms. Sternheim received a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad.
Judge Pauley had a conversation with 'The Answerer' about their finances and ability to hire a lawyer.
MR. GAIR is examining Ms. Conrad.
MR. OKULA is participating in the inquiry involving Ms. Conrad.
The Court is presiding over the inquiry involving Ms. Conrad.
The Answerer stated they rendered a guilty verdict against 'your client'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Hi, it's Catherine Conrad. I won't be showing up to the hearing today. Thank you."Source
— Catherine Conrad
(Voice mail message played in court, explaining her absence from the hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
Quote #1
"Have you any cash on hand or money in savings or checking accounts?"Source
— The Court (Judge Pauley, as quoted from a prior transcript)
(Question asked to 'The Answerer' on December 20th regarding their financial status.)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
Quote #2
"As opposed to what? As opposed next month or as opposed to what? That's not -- I don't understand what you're saying, sir."Source
— The Answerer
(Response given to Judge Pauley's question about finances on December 20th, indicating a lack of understanding or refusal to answer directly.)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
Quote #3
"My personal finances have nothing to do with this. Thank you. They have nothing to do with this. I can get counsel any time I want, federal or state. Thank you, sir."Source
— The Answerer
(Statement made to Judge Pauley on December 20th, asserting that personal finances are irrelevant to the proceedings and that legal counsel can be obtained independently.)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
Quote #4
"If that's what it sets, then that's what I said, sir."Source
— The Answerer
(Confirming a previous statement about personal finances and the ability to secure a lawyer, under questioning by Mr. Gair.)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document