Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Gair

Person
Mentions
86
Relationships
17
Events
38
Documents
42
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
17 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MR. OKULA
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
7
2
View
organization The Court
Professional
6
2
View
person Catherine M. Conrad
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Conrad
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Conrad
Professional
6
2
View
person Catherine Conrad
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Paul Daugerdas
Professional
6
1
View
person Conrad
Adversarial
6
2
View
person Catherine M. Conrad
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Professional
5
1
View
person Mr. Donohue
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. DAVIS
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Adversarial
5
1
View
person MR. OKULA
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Catherine M. Conrad
Witness examiner
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court testimony Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant informati... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Legal proceeding Direct examination of a witness named Brune. N/A View
N/A Trip The underlying trial in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of a witness regarding juror Catherine M. Conrad's background check. Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to investigate Juror No. 1, Ms. Con... Courtroom View
N/A Trial A trial in which Conrad served as a juror and David Parse was a defendant. N/A View
N/A Court hearing A hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas where the defense and prosecu... Courtroom View
2022-02-24 Court testimony Direct examination of witness Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant information' conc... Courtroom (implied) View
2012-02-15 Court hearing A court hearing to discuss an application to close the courtroom for the testimony of Ms. Conrad,... courtroom View
2012-02-15 Flight Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against sel... courtroom View
2012-02-15 Court hearing Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad. Federal Court, Southern Dis... View
2012-02-15 Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness/juror Conrad. N/A View
2012-02-15 Court hearing Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Dauge... Federal courtroom View
2012-02-15 Court hearing Direct examination of witness Conrad by Mr. Gair regarding a prior court event. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 Court hearing A court hearing in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., involving the testimony of a wi... Courtroom of the Southern D... View
2012-02-15 Adjournment The court hearing was adjourned until 9:45 a.m. the following day, February 16, 2012. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding involving the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. ... Court (Southern District) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings in United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court testimony of Ms. Conrad regarding her juror service. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court hearing involving witness Conrad. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court hearing regarding juror misconduct (Conrad). Witness excuses, arrest warrant discussed but ... Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court hearing where Catherine Conrad is granted immunity and examined regarding juror misconduct. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings in USA v. Daugerdas; direct examination of Catherine Conrad. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court testimony of witness Conrad in US v. Daugerdas. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 N/A Court hearing/Examination of Ms. Conrad Courtroom (Southern District) View

DOJ-OGR-00009274.jpg

This document is a court transcript index from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012. It has been filed as an exhibit (Document 616-1) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), likely as a legal precedent or impeachment material regarding witness testimony. The page lists the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, along with a list of Government and Defense (PMD) exhibits received into evidence.

Court transcript index / exhibit list
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009273.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the cross-examination and dismissal of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who admits to perjury and misrepresentation regarding her service as a juror. Defense counsel (Mr. Gair) characterizes her as a 'pathological liar.' The proceedings also involve discussions about calling a U.S. Marshal and a law student named Mr. Benhamou as witnesses, though the latter is dismissed to return to class. The document appears to be an exhibit filed in a later case (likely Giuffre v. Maxwell based on the 2022 filing stamp).

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009271.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad. The questioning, led primarily by attorney Mr. Shechtman, focuses on why she failed to disclose information during jury selection (voir dire), such as her husband's criminal record and her own suspended legal career. Conrad defends her 'omissions,' while the attorney probes whether she lied to get on the jury for the $40/day stipend, out of curiosity, or for 'intellectual stimulation'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009267.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad regarding their service in a trial involving defendant David Parse. The questioning probes Conrad's impartiality, focusing on a post-verdict letter, their initial belief in the defendant's guilt, and whether their own past criminal history (including arrests for DUI and shoplifting) biased their judgment. Conrad consistently affirms that their final decision was based solely on the evidence and Judge Pauley's legal instructions, and that their personal history did not affect their ability to be fair and impartial.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009266.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of the United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the direct and cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad, regarding her failure to disclose significant personal information during jury selection, including her status as a suspended lawyer and her husband's extensive criminal record. The questioning explores whether she deliberately concealed this information and whether she held any bias that would have affected her judgment in the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009265.jpg

This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, from the case 'United States v. Daugerdas', filed as Exhibit A-5661 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Ms. Conrad (likely the infamous juror Catherine Conrad), who admits to lying and omitting information during voir dire to make herself 'more marketable as a juror.' The questioning covers her husband's criminal record (convicted felon, 7.5-year sentence), her own disciplinary suspension by the Bar Association, and her flippant 'smart ass' attitude toward the court.

Court transcript (exhibit a-5661)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009264.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Conrad, by attorneys Mr. Gair and Mr. Schectman. The questioning focuses intensely on a letter Conrad wrote to attorney Mr. Okula, specifically her choice of postage stamp and her decision to capitalize the words "our government," probing her motivations and opinions about other individuals involved in the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009263.jpg

This document is a four-page transcript excerpt (pages 197-200) from the case United States v. Daugerdas (February 15, 2012), filed as Exhibit A-5659 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The transcript features the examination of a witness named Ms. Conrad regarding a letter she sent to a Mr. Okula (likely a fellow juror), in which she included her phone number and discussed her reasoning for convicting defendant David Parse. The questioning highlights contradictions between what Conrad wrote to Okula on May 25th (claiming she wanted to convict Parse 100%) and what she told Judge Pauley on December 20th (claiming Parse shouldn't have been convicted on count 1). This document was likely used in the Maxwell trial to argue legal precedents regarding juror misconduct.

Court transcript (exhibit)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009262.jpg

This document is a transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, but released within an Epstein-related document dump (DOJ-OGR-00009262). It features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad (also known as Rosa), regarding a letter she wrote to prosecutor Mr. Okula on May 25, 2011, the day after a verdict was reached in a previous trial where she served as a juror. The questioning focuses on her anxiety to speak with the prosecution, discrepancies between her physical location (Barker Avenue) and the return address used (Parkview Drive), and her failure to contact defense attorneys.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009258.jpg

This document is a transcript from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of witness Catherine Conrad (also known as Catherine Rosa), focusing on her credibility, her indefinite suspension from the practice of law, her alcoholism, and her arrest for petit larceny in 2009. The testimony reveals she submitted inaccurate medical reports regarding her sobriety to support her petition for reinstatement to the bar.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the trial *United States v. Daugerdas* (Feb 15, 2012), likely filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to challenge the credibility of a juror (Catherine Conrad). The transcript details the cross-examination of Conrad regarding her suspension from the practice of law, her history of alcoholism, and her failure to disclose these facts to the court (specifically Judge Pauley). Several exhibits (PMD 14, 17, and 20) confirming her disciplinary history and medical issues are admitted into evidence during the questioning.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg

This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Daugerdas, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of Ms. Conrad (a former juror who is a suspended lawyer) regarding her financial status, specifically establishing she had approximately $14,000 in assets versus her claim of indigence for legal counsel. The questioning highlights discrepancies between her court testimony and a sworn affidavit submitted to the Bar disciplinary committee regarding her tax returns and income.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009245.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, by an attorney, Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on a prior court appearance where Conrad, upon being given a financial affidavit to determine her eligibility for a court-appointed lawyer, declared, "This is garbage." Gair probes Conrad's memory, motivations, and the rationality of her statement, which she describes as a "kneejerk reaction."

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009244.jpg

This document is a court transcript from the trial 'United States v. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, which was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, focusing on her mental state (medication use), her refusal to accept a subpoena during a December 20th hearing before Judge Pauley, and her financial inability to hire counsel. The questioning attorney challenges Conrad on whether her behavior of rejecting a subpoena and inviting arrest was 'rational' conduct for an officer of the court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg

This court transcript from February 15, 2012, documents the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who is also a trained lawyer. The questioning centers on her defiance of a court order to appear, having told Judge Pauley's clerk she was not coming, and her rationale for this action which she is unable to explain. The testimony also reveals she was unaware of a potential immunity deal and had met with her apparent counsel, Ms. Sternheim, six times before the hearing.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009239.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of witness Catherine M. Conrad, who initially pleads the Fifth Amendment regarding her prior testimony from March 2011. After being granted use immunity by the court, Conrad admits under questioning that her previous testimony as a prospective juror contained both omissions and lies.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010046.jpg

This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on jury research conducted for jury selection, a specific telephone call on July 22nd with a judge regarding a juror connected to Catherine Conrad, and the witness's failure to identify "Mr. Nardello's firm" during that call. The transcript concludes with the witness confirming their firm resisted a subsequent government discovery request by filing a brief claiming the information was protected as client work product.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010045.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (page 305) filed on May 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is being questioned about the disclosure of a private investigation firm, Nardello, in a legal brief and during a conference call with Judge Pauley. The testimony confirms that the Nardello firm performed jury research and investigative work pertaining to 'Juror No. 1' after a specific letter was received.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 22, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on whether she understood certain information about a potential juror to be significant, particularly to a Judge Pauley. The transcript includes objections from attorneys Mr. Gair and Mr. Schectman, and rulings from the presiding judge.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009985.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas. The prosecution and defense agree to a stipulation to enter a witness report (PMD Exhibit 4) and police records (PMD 27) into evidence, avoiding the need for the witness to testify. Following the admission of this evidence, the defense rests its case, and the government proceeds by calling its next witness, Susan Brune.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009953.jpg

This document is a transcript index and exhibit list from the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.,' dated February 15, 2012. It outlines the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad by attorneys Hernandez, Shechtman, Gair, and Okula. It also lists Government Exhibits (4, 5, 9, 14, 28) and PMD (Paul M. Daugerdas) Exhibits admitted into evidence. The document is stamped with a 2022 filing date (Case 1:20-cv-00335-PAE), indicating it was submitted as an exhibit in the Giuffre v. Dershowitz case.

Court transcript index / exhibit list
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009952.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. A witness, Conrad, apologizes for committing perjury to serve on a jury; the court acknowledges an arrest warrant for her but decides to release her. The attorneys discuss the scheduling of future witnesses, including a U.S. Marshal and a law student, before the court adjourns until the following morning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1

Cross examination regarding financial affidavit

From: Conrad
To: Mr. Gair

Testimony regarding whether the witness called a financial affidavit 'garbage' and her ability to afford counsel.

Court testimony
2012-02-15
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search