HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg

2.44 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal article / law review page
File Size: 2.44 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 34 of 78 in the production) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 17 subpoenas. The text argues that victim privacy and dignity interests should subordinate defense strategy interests, criticizing the Advisory Committee's notes on ex parte procedures. The document bears the name David Schoen (a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.

People (3)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Author / Attorney
Name appears at the bottom of the page, likely indicating authorship of the article or that the document was produced...
Urlacher Defendant
Defendant in cited case United States v. Urlacher.
Beckford Defendant
Defendant in cited case United States v. Beckford.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Utah Law Review
Publisher of the article (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
Advisory Committee
Refers to the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules, whose notes and procedures are being critiqued.
Congress
Mentioned as the body that commanded victim treatment standards.
House Oversight Committee
Document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location associated with the Law Review.

Key Quotes (4)

"Even if there is some arguable defense interest in not disclosing 'strategy,' that interest must be subordinated to the compelling victim interests that are at stake."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
Quote #1
"Congress has commanded that victims must not only be treated with 'fairness,' but also 'with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
Quote #2
"The CVRA commands that victims have 'the right' to 'be treated ... with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
Quote #3
"Thus, if withholding notice to a victim fails to respect the victim's dignity and privacy (as I believe it invariably will), then the court must give notice - end of story."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document