David Schoen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
IG (Inspector General)
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LexisNexis
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Case
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document custodian subject of inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation target witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Adversarial critical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The IG
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sean Hannity
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Subject of investigation provider of documents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-22 | N/A | Email sent regarding a Tea Party Pac article. | Internet | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen conducted a LexisNexis search for legal materials regarding 'cvra and sixth amendment'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search for legal articles regarding the Crime Victims' Rights... | N/A | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | Legal research conducted by David Schoen. | N/A | View |
| 2016-06-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and David Schoen. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Law Review Article | Utah | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication of BYU Law Review article | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | State v. Casey court case | Utah | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Fortier decision | Tenth Circuit | View |
EFTA00035147.pdf
This document is a handwritten Bureau of Prisons (BOP) visitor log, likely from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, covering the dates August 1, 2019, through August 7, 2019. It records the names of visitors, their signatures, the inmates they visited (including registration numbers), and the time in/out. The log shows frequent, often daily, visits to inmate Jeffrey Epstein (Reg #76318-054) by various individuals, including known members of his legal team such as Darren Indyke, Mariel Colon, and G. Tali, in the days immediately preceding his death on August 10, 2019. No flight records are contained in this document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.jpg
An email dated June 15, 2019, from David Schoen to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) alerting him that Fox News is re-running an article. The article discusses a civil lawsuit settlement Epstein reached with alleged victims to avoid testimony and describes him as a 'Clinton-linked financier.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.jpg
An email from attorney David Schoen to Jeffrey Epstein dated June 15, 2019, discussing a Fox News article about Epstein settling a civil lawsuit. Schoen criticizes the article's characterization of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) as 'moronic' and expresses a strong desire for the media to report on admissions he claims accusers made under oath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.jpg
This document is an email sent by David Schoen on March 26, 2019, sharing a Fox News article about the death of a 96-year-old U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein. The email highlights Epstein's description as a 'Clinton-connected financier and sex offender.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031803.jpg
An email exchange dated June 15, 2019, between 'J' (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and attorney David Schoen. Schoen forwards a Fox News article about Epstein settling a civil lawsuit to avoid testimony, noting that Fox is re-running the story. 'J' replies briefly with 'no worry how are you'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031802.jpg
This document is an email exchange from March 26, 2019, between David Schoen and 'J' (Jeffrey Epstein, using the address jeevacation@gmail.com). Schoen forwards a Fox News article reporting the death of a federal judge who was presiding over a lawsuit involving Epstein; Epstein acknowledges the news with a single word response: 'Yup'. The email footer contains a disclaimer asserting the content is the property of 'JEE' and may be attorney-client privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.jpg
An email exchange between 'J' (using the jeevacation@gmail.com address associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and attorney David Schoen regarding a news article about the 2008 plea deal. Schoen criticizes the article's claim that victims were silenced and comments on other lawyers involved, specifically Dershowitz and Lefkowitz. 'J' responds dismissively, stating that 'every outlet needs a sex story.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.jpg
David Schoen sends an email to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' on March 22, 2019, sharing a link to a conspiracy theory article from Tea Party Pac. Schoen dismisses the site as 'nut' and 'whacko' but notes it gets significant attention. The article alleges the recipient is an informant for Robert Mueller, and Schoen points out that this narrative undercuts the Trump administration ('the Prez') and Alex Acosta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031561.jpg
An email thread from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Robert Mueller investigation, with Schoen offering harsh criticisms of prosecutors Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, while Epstein compares the bias of FBI agent Peter Strzok to mob prosecutors. Schoen also mentions media coverage tying Epstein to Donald Trump and the #MeToo movement, expressing regret that he was not chosen to help Epstein with his legal defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031560.jpg
An email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation) and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Mueller investigation, specifically criticizing Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, and Andrew Weissmann for alleged political bias and misconduct. Schoen provides a detailed anecdote accusing Weissmann of unethical behavior in the EDNY.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031493.jpg
This document contains an email thread between David Schoen and Jeffrey Epstein spanning from 2013 to 2016. In 2013, Schoen asks Epstein for advice on hiring a Private Investigator named Mike Fisten for a lawsuit against the Broward County Sheriff's Department; Epstein advises against it ('Dont') and suggests 'William Riley' instead. In May 2016, Schoen emails Epstein expressing sympathy regarding negative press and legal issues, to which Epstein replies suggesting they meet in June.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016551.jpg
This document is the final page (42 of 42) of a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article discussing the legal theory of 'underenforcement,' particularly regarding sexual assault crimes and police violence. It compares U.S. federal oversight and local prosecution to systems in England and Canada. The text concludes that current safeguards are insufficient for marginalized victim groups. The document contains the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' at the bottom and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included as an exhibit in a congressional inquiry, likely related to Schoen's representation of high-profile clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016550.jpg
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016547.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review contains a series of footnotes (188-201) discussing legal topics such as rape law reform, crime statistics, and federal police reform. It references various statutes like the Violence Against Women Act and 42 U.S.C. § 14141, as well as specific cases like United States v. Screws and the prosecution of Michael Slager.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016546.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal filing submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (indicated by the footer). The content is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) containing footnotes 178-187, which discuss the history of sexual assault legislation, the backlog of untested rape kits, the evolution of 'rape shield' laws, and the efficacy of specialized prosecution units for sexual crimes and prison abuse. While the text discusses general legal precedents and statistics regarding sexual assault, its submission by Schoen suggests relevance to a specific investigation, likely regarding the handling of sexual abuse cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016545.jpg
This document is page 36 of 42 from a legal filing or research file belonging to David Schoen (attorney), specifically an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 844). The text consists of footnotes (163-177) discussing federal jurisdiction (Travel Act, honest services fraud), discrepancies in sexual assault reporting statistics between the FBI and CDC, and criticism of law enforcement clearance rates for sexual crimes, including specific references to the LAPD and LA Sheriff's Department. The document appears to be part of a larger collection produced to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), specifically the conclusion of an article discussing prosecutorial discretion, victim rights, and federalism/state jurisdiction. It appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely to support legal arguments regarding the handling of the Epstein case, specifically concerning the non-prosecution agreement or federal/state jurisdiction issues. The text analyzes the differences between U.S. and foreign legal systems regarding the ability of victims to challenge decisions not to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016543.jpg
This page from a legal text discusses the limitations of political supervision and electoral accountability in ensuring rigorous prosecution, particularly for marginalized groups like undocumented immigrants and prisoners. It evaluates alternative mechanisms such as judicial review and federal oversight to address underenforcement, while footnotes provide citations regarding public corruption laws and statistics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016542.jpg
A page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The document contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the politics of prosecutorial discretion, specifically regarding underenforcement in cases of domestic violence and sexual assault. It also includes footnotes citing various federal statutes related to sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. § 1591), public corruption, and bribery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016541.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion, federal versus state enforcement redundancy, and political accountability in the context of police violence and other crimes. It highlights the 'executive separation of powers' model and the limitations of democratic accountability for elected state prosecutors. The page also contains numerous footnotes citing legal precedents, government reports, and academic works related to the Department of Justice and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016540.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 904) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the legal theory of 'federal redundancy' and the 'dual sovereignty' doctrine (citing Gamble v. United States), arguing that federal prosecutors serve as a check on local prosecutors in cases of police misconduct. While the text focuses on police violence and double jeopardy laws, its inclusion in this production is likely relevant to legal arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement and whether federal charges could supersede state agreements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016539.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol 103) discussing the complexities of federal versus state jurisdiction in cases of police violence and 'excessive use of force.' It analyzes the high 'mens rea' standard required for federal prosecution and compares the US system to those of Germany, Canada, and Australia. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, possibly related to arguments about federal jurisdiction or deaths in custody.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
This document page features an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the evolution of sexual assault laws, contrasting historical common law restrictions with modern reforms like rape shield laws. It also contains footnotes detailing state prosecutorial structures and citing legal precedents regarding prosecutorial discretion and equal protection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016535.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the lack of federal jurisdiction overlap in sexual assault cases compared to public corruption, noting that federal law usually only applies in specific instances like human trafficking or crimes on federal property. The footnotes extensively cite the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)) and various state constitutions regarding a victim's right to confer with the prosecution, a legal issue relevant to the handling of the Epstein case.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen shares a Fox News article about a civil settlement, criticizes the article's framing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement), expresses a desire for 'true facts' about accusers to be published, and wishes Epstein 'Good Shabbos'.
Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offen...
no worry how are you
From Fox News...
I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. [Includes text of Fox News article about Epstein lawsuit settlement]
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
Re: From Fox News...
Yup
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Sharing a Fox News article about the death of a federal judge involved in the Epstein lawsuit.
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Forwarded a Fox News article snippet and link about the death of a federal judge overseeing an Epstein lawsuit.
Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Ch...
Schoen shares a link to a 'nut site' article that alleges the recipient is a Mueller informant, noting the political contradictions involving Acosta and Trump.
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped se...
yes, every outlet needs a sex story
Shared Article from AOL...
Discusses media coverage, Dershowitz, and Lefkowitz. Claims the article is wrong about victims being silenced.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
Re: Hello
Asks if the situation is overblown, compares it to mob prosecutors hating Gotti, asks why Strzok is different.
N/A
Discusses obsession with prosecutorial misconduct, mentions #metoo press tying Epstein to Trump, expresses regret at not being able to help Epstein legally.
Re: Hello
Discusses Strzok testimony, McCabe, bias, and asks 'we're on the same team'.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
Re: Hello
Detailed criticism of Mueller's team (Rhee, Andres), discussion of Russia election interference, and mention of being a guest on Hannity.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Hello (inferred from reply)
A detailed critique of the Mueller investigation team, accusing members Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past prosecutorial misconduct, withholding evidence, and having strong political biases (pro-Clinton, anti-Trump). The author expresses his obsession with fighting FBI and prosecutorial misconduct.
Re: Hello
A reply questioning if the bias described by Schoen is 'overblown'. Compares the situation to mob prosecutors having strong feelings for their targets like Gotti and asks why 'stryok' (Peter Strzok) is considered different.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity