DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg

639 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
8
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 639 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated March 1, 2022, addresses the potential bias of Juror 50 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details questions posed to Juror 50 regarding his recollection of a jury questionnaire about sexual abuse, particularly in light of an interview he gave to a Daily Mail reporter. The document argues that Juror 50's childhood sexual abuse, similar to that of witnesses, is sufficient grounds for a 'for cause' challenge, citing legal precedent on implied and inferable bias.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable (Judge)
Addressee of the document, likely the presiding judge in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Juror 50 Juror
The subject of an inquiry into potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse.
Torres
Defendant in the cited legal case United States v. Torres.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Daily Mail newspaper
Organization whose reporter interviewed Juror 50.
United States government agency
Plaintiff in the cited legal case United States v. Torres.
Court government agency
The judicial body that should inquire about bias and rule on challenges.
Defense legal party
The party making arguments regarding Juror 50's bias.

Timeline (3 events)

Completion of a jury questionnaire by Juror 50, including questions about sexual abuse.
Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a reporter.
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan Juror 50 Defense Court
A 'for cause' challenge against Juror 50 based on implied, inferable, or actual bias.

Relationships (3)

Juror 50 professional Daily Mail reporter
Juror 50 was interviewed by the reporter regarding his jury questionnaire.
Juror 50 legal/professional Court
The Court is tasked with inquiring into Juror 50's potential bias and ruling on challenges.
Juror 50 legal/adversarial Defense
The Defense is arguing for Juror 50 to be struck for cause due to bias.

Key Quotes (8)

"And when you made that statement to the Daily Mail reporter, you had not seen your jury questionnaire since you had filled it out."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #1
"So, at the time of your interview with the Daily Mail, you recalled a question about whether or not a family member or a relative was sexually abused, but you didn't recall a question about whether you yourself were sexually abused?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #2
"Question 48 is the only question in the entire questionnaire that asks whether you or a friend or a family member has been the victim of sexual abuse?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #3
"And the word "you" comes before "friend" and "family member"?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #4
"So, you're saying that you read this question closely enough at the time you filled out the questionnaire to remember that it asked about sexual abuse involving your friends and family members, but not involving yourself?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #5
"So, you didn't "fly through" this question – you remember almost all of it?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #6
"The only part you now claim you "flew through" is the part that asked about your own sexual abuse?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #7
"Challenges for cause can be based on implied bias, inferable bias, or actual bias."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009651.jpg
Quote #8

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document