DOJ-OGR-00002303(1).jpg
683 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
683 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, is a motion from Ms. Maxwell requesting the Court to dismiss Count One or Count Three of her Superseding Indictment. She argues that these counts are multiplicitous, charging the same offense twice, and thus violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The document cites legal precedents to define multiplicity and explain its dangers.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
requests that the Court dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment
|
| Jones |
Cited in legal case United States v. Jones
|
|
| Estrada |
Cited in legal case United States v. Estrada
|
|
| Colton |
Cited in legal case United States v. Colton
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Government agency |
Party in legal cases (United States Constitution, crime against the United States, United States v. Jones, United Sta...
|
| Court | Government agency |
Ms. Maxwell requests that the Court dismiss
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-01-25
Ms. Maxwell filed a motion requesting the Court to dismiss Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment as multiplicitous, arguing it violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Relationships (1)
Count One... charges Ms. Maxwell with conspiracy to commit a crime against the United States
Key Quotes (4)
"An indictment is multiplicitous when a single offense is alleged in more than one count."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002303(1).jpg
Quote #1
"the same in fact and in law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002303(1).jpg
Quote #2
"[T]he principle danger created by multiplicity is that a defendant will receive multiple punishments for a single offense."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002303(1).jpg
Quote #3
"The second danger [of multiplicity] is the adverse psychological effect on the jury prejudicing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002303(1).jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document