DOJ-OGR-00021136.jpg
588 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
588 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, discusses the conviction of Maxwell on Count Four, which was based on Jane's testimony about sexual activity with Epstein in New Mexico. It argues that the Court's failure to address the jury's misunderstanding, as revealed by a 'Jury Note' concerning the transportation count, warrants vacating Maxwell's convictions on Counts Three and Four and granting a new trial. The document highlights the distinction between the original indictment and the basis for conviction, implicitly linking the 'defendant' in the jury note to Maxwell.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Convicted person |
Convicted of Count Four; convictions on Counts Three and Four are discussed for vacating.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Provided testimony about sexual activity/abuse; subject of transportation.
|
| Epstein | Perpetrator |
Involved in sexual activity with Jane at his ranch.
|
| defendant | Accused |
Aided in the transportation of Jane’s return flight (as per the Jury Note).
|
Organizations (2)
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where sexual activity violated New York Penal Law §130.55; sexual activity need not have occurred there.
|
|
|
Location of Epstein's ranch; where Jane's testimony about sexual abuse occurred; mentioned in context of a flight.
|
Relationships (3)
Maxwell was convicted based on Jane’s testimony; the document discusses vacating Maxwell's convictions related to Jane's testimony.
Jane provided testimony about sexual activity with Epstein at his ranch in New Mexico, and sexual abuse in New Mexico.
Key Quotes (1)
"Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane’s return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"Source
— jury
(The exact wording of the 'Jury Note' sent during deliberations.)
DOJ-OGR-00021136.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document