DOJ-OGR-00009741.jpg

885 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
9
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 885 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is a page from a motion arguing for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. The argument centers on the post-trial conduct of 'Juror No. 50,' who allegedly engaged in a paid publicity tour, gave interviews for a documentary, and communicated with journalist Annie Farmer, demonstrating bias. The document criticizes the government for publicly filing a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's tour, arguing this was an improper procedure that alerted the juror to scrutiny, whereas Ms. Maxwell's counsel would have objected and preferred the matter be handled under seal.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Juror No. 50 Juror
A juror whose post-trial conduct, including a publicity tour and interviews, is being used as a basis to argue for a ...
Ghislaine
Mentioned in the title of a documentary, “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.” Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell.
Prince Andrew
Mentioned in the title of a documentary, “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
Annie Farmer
A person with whom Juror No. 50 communicated directly.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in the case. The document argues that Juror No. 50 persuaded other jurors to convict her. It also state...

Organizations (9)

Name Type Context
ITV company
A British television channel that aired a documentary featuring an interview with Juror No. 50.
Twitter company
A social media platform where Juror No. 50 engaged with a journalist.
British press media
Mentioned in a footnote as commonly paying for crime victims' stories.
mirror.co.uk media
Cited as an example of British press paying for stories.
trianglenews.co.uk media
Cited as an example of British press paying for stories.
dailymail.co.uk media
Cited as an example of British press paying for stories.
The government government agency
The prosecuting party in the case, which publicly filed a letter asking the Court to inquire into Juror No. 50's cond...
this Court government agency
The judicial body overseeing the case.
DOJ-OGR government agency
Appears in the footer of the document (DOJ-OGR-00009741), likely standing for Department of Justice.

Timeline (3 events)

Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
The government publicly filed Docket No. 568, a letter concerning Juror No. 50's conduct.
this Court
early January 2022
Juror No. 50 engaged in a publicity tour, giving multiple interviews to news outlets.

Relationships (4)

Juror No. 50 communication Annie Farmer
The document states that Juror No. 50 'has communicated directly with Annie Farmer.'
Juror No. 50 juror-defendant Ms. Maxwell
Juror No. 50 was a juror in Ms. Maxwell's trial and is described as having a 'biased view of the evidence' and persuading other jurors 'to vote to convict Ms. Maxwell.'
The government adversarial Juror No. 50
The government took action by filing a public letter to stop Juror No. 50's publicity tour and to have his conduct scrutinized by the Court.
Ms. Maxwell adversarial (legal) The government
The document is part of a legal case where the government is the prosecuting party and Ms. Maxwell is the defendant. This page criticizes the government's actions on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document