ITV
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Kathryn Milofsky
|
Employment |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00030378.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 involving US Attorneys (USANYS) discussing a media inquiry. Kathryn Milofsky, a producer for ITV News based in NY, emailed a US Attorney asking for the date of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail hearing. The internal USANYS response indicates that one attorney will handle the response and instruct the media not to contact the original recipient further.
EFTA00023771.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 8, 2020, initiating with a media request from Kathryn Milofsky (ITV News) to an unnamed official (likely US Department of Justice or SDNY). Milofsky requests an interview regarding the official's request to interview Prince Andrew concerning the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and a recent MLA (Mutual Legal Assistance) request. The internal chain shows the official instructing staff to decline the interview and checking if a specific tweet had been sent.
EFTA00018556.pdf
This document is an email dated June 8, 2020, from Kathryn Milofsky, a producer at ITV News, to Mr. Berman (likely U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman). Milofsky requests a 10-minute Skype interview with Berman to discuss his request to interview Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and a specific Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request. The email pitches ITV's reach and prestige to encourage participation.
DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues that 'Juror No. 50' gave false answers during jury selection, which prevented the Court from properly assessing his impartiality and potential biases. The filing asserts that truthful answers would have led to the juror's removal. It also notes that the juror has continued to engage in 'media exploits,' including appearing in a documentary on January 18, 2022, despite being represented by counsel in this matter.
DOJ-OGR-00009050.jpg
This legal document argues that a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, engaged in a post-trial publicity tour, including a documentary interview, potentially for financial gain. The government's public filing of a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's media appearances is presented as a strategic move to prevent further scrutiny of the juror's conduct, which could have provided grounds for a new trial for the defendant, Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00009744.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. It argues that 'Juror No. 50' provided false answers during voir dire regarding social media usage to hide biases and ensure selection, noting he later used Twitter to contact victim Annie Farmer and appeared in an ITV documentary. The text contrasts this behavior with Juror No. 55, whose falsehoods were exposed through follow-up questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00009741.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is a page from a motion arguing for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. The argument centers on the post-trial conduct of 'Juror No. 50,' who allegedly engaged in a paid publicity tour, gave interviews for a documentary, and communicated with journalist Annie Farmer, demonstrating bias. The document criticizes the government for publicly filing a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's tour, arguing this was an improper procedure that alerted the juror to scrutiny, whereas Ms. Maxwell's counsel would have objected and preferred the matter be handled under seal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity