DOJ-OGR-00013188.jpg

480 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 480 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on refreshing Carolyn's memory about a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen, and a separate 'second visit' where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs. Carolyn confirms the first memory but denies being led upstairs by anyone.

People (7)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the proceeding, correcting Mr. Pagliuca and directing the questioning.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Conducting a cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn.
THE WITNESS Witness
Being cross-examined, later identified as Carolyn.
Carolyn Witness
The witness being questioned by Mr. Pagliuca about her prior statements to the FBI.
Sarah
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca as being present and leading Carolyn upstairs during a 'second visit'.
paralegal Paralegal
Mentioned by the Court as someone whose screen Mr. Pagliuca should look at.
chef Chef
Mentioned in a question about what Carolyn told the FBI in 2007.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FBI government agency
Mentioned as the agency Carolyn gave a statement to in 2007.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.

Timeline (4 events)

2007
Carolyn gave a statement to the FBI.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca.
Courtroom
Carolyn sat in a kitchen and was asked by a chef if she was hungry. This is based on her 2007 FBI statement.
kitchen
A 'second visit' where Mr. Pagliuca alleges Sarah was present and led Carolyn upstairs.
unspecified property

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where Carolyn allegedly sat and was asked by a chef if she was hungry.
Location where Sarah allegedly led Carolyn during a 'second visit'.

Relationships (3)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney cross-examining Carolyn, who is a witness in a court proceeding.
THE COURT professional MR. PAGLIUCA
The Court (judge) is presiding over the case and directs Mr. Pagliuca's line of questioning.
Carolyn unspecified Sarah
Mr. Pagliuca alleges they were together during a 'second visit'. Carolyn denies being led by anyone but does not explicitly deny Sarah's presence.

Key Quotes (3)

"Carolyn, does that refresh your memory that that's what you told the FBI in 2007, that you sat in the kitchen and the chef asked if you were hungry?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Questioning the witness about a prior statement made to the FBI.)
DOJ-OGR-00013188.jpg
Quote #1
"Isn't it also true that on that second visit, Sarah was there and led you upstairs?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Questioning the witness about another alleged event.)
DOJ-OGR-00013188.jpg
Quote #2
"I wasn't led upstairs by anybody."
Source
— Carolyn (The witness's response to Mr. Pagliuca's question about being led upstairs by Sarah.)
DOJ-OGR-00013188.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document