FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 16 of 16.PDF
This document set consists primarily of 'Deleted Page Information Sheets' indicating that 515 pages of records have been withheld from the release, citing Grand Jury secrecy (b3-1) and privacy (b6, b7C). The visible content includes three FBI FD-340 forms (Receipt for Property) dated April 9, 2008. These receipts document the FBI's Miami/Palm Beach office receiving 'Subpoena Results for telephone #' (number redacted). The 'Grand Jury Material' box is checked on the receipts.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 08 of 08.pdf
This document consists of 'Deleted Page Information Sheets' from FBI Civil Action #17-cv-03956. It lists hundreds of pages (Total 434 in one section, 133 in another) that were withheld in their entirety from the release based on FOIA exemptions b3 (statutory), b6 (privacy), b7C (law enforcement privacy), b7D (confidential sources), and b7E (law enforcement techniques). No substantive investigative content is visible, as these are administrative placeholders for withheld material.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 03 of 08.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI internal memos, administrative forms, and news clippings related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2011. It covers the FBI's monitoring of the state case, the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement, victim notification procedures, and the prosecution of Epstein's butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, for obstruction of justice. Significant portions include news articles detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew and the operations of the MC2 modeling agency.
Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.25 (Redacted).pdf
This document is a transcript of a proffer interview with Ghislaine Maxwell conducted by the DOJ and FBI on July 25, 2025. Maxwell discusses her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, denies participating in or witnessing sexual abuse of minors, and details her interactions with high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Elon Musk. She addresses financial transactions, flight logs, and specific allegations regarding recruitment of women for Epstein.
Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf
This document is a transcript of an interview, or 'proffer,' of Ghislaine Maxwell conducted by the United States Department of Justice on July 24, 2025. The interview involves legal counsel for Maxwell and various US government representatives, primarily focusing on the terms and conditions of a proffer agreement, emphasizing that it is not a cooperation agreement and outlines the immunity and exceptions related to false statements.
Epstein_Part_10.pdf
This document is an administrative sheet from the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding Civil Action #17-cv-03956. It provides a complete list of 547 pages that were deleted in their entirety from the FOIA release. The document cites specific exemptions for each deleted page, primarily b3 (Grand Jury secrecy), b6 and b7C (personal privacy), and b7D (confidential source protection). No substantive content regarding investigations, flights, or individuals is contained in this document itself; it serves solely as a log of withheld material.
Epstein_Part_06.pdf
This document contains a series of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing pages withheld from a FOIA release under various exemptions, followed by several FBI internal communications (Electronic Communications and Payment Request forms) concerning the case of Jeffrey Epstein (Case ID 31E-MM-108062). The memos track the opening of sub-files for subpoena and forfeiture matters, updates on forfeiture investigations involving properties in Palm Beach, and interactions with the US Attorney's Office, culminating in a request to close the forfeiture sub-file in 2008 due to state prosecution.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
059.pdf
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) between the United States and Tova Noel, a Bureau of Prisons employee charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Noel admits to knowingly falsifying count and round slips at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. The agreement defers prosecution for six months pending her good behavior, 100 hours of community service, and cooperation with investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), after which the indictment will be dismissed if conditions are met.
014.pdf
This document is the transcript of the arraignment for Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the two prison guards charged in connection with falsifying records related to Jeffrey Epstein's detention. The hearing took place on November 19, 2019, before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in the Southern District of New York. Both defendants pleaded not guilty and were released on $100,000 bond with travel restrictions. A significant portion of the hearing involved a debate over whether Noel should be required to surrender her personal firearm; the judge ruled she must surrender it for the safety of pretrial services officers.
046.pdf
A letter dated August 12, 2019, from MCC Warden Lamine N'Diaye to Judge Richard Berman regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Warden confirms that ongoing FBI and OIG investigations will cover a specific incident involving Epstein that occurred at the MCC on or about July 23, 2019. Due to these active investigations, the Warden declines to divulge information about a completed internal investigation regarding that same incident.
040.pdf
This document is a transcript of the bail decision hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 18, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. The court denied Epstein's request for pretrial release and granted the government's application for continued remand, citing clear and convincing evidence of danger to the community and a preponderance of evidence regarding flight risk. The judge highlighted evidence including seized cash, diamonds, a fake Austrian passport, and testimony from victims Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild regarding their fear of the defendant.
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
020.pdf
Transcript of the initial appearance and arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The government argues for pretrial detention, citing extreme flight risk due to wealth/private jets and danger to the community based on evidence found in his home (photos of minors) and potential witness tampering. The defense pleads not guilty, argues the conduct is 'ancient' (2002-2005), and claims a 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement covers the conduct; a full detention hearing is scheduled for July 11.
018.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
017-12.pdf
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
020.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on June 16, 2010, in the case of L.M. v. Epstein. Epstein's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to serve the complaint within the required 120 days (Rule 4(m)). Furthermore, the motion alleges that the complaint filed by L.M. (represented by Bradley Edwards) was used as a prop in Scott Rothstein's massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to lure investors with fabricated settlement agreements. The document cites depositions where L.M. contradicts allegations made in her complaint regarding sexual acts and travel.
020-01.pdf
This document contains a series of court orders and motions from the case *Morse v. Jan Jones International, Inc.* (Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM) in the Southern District of Florida. The Plaintiffs, represented by Scott Rothstein, successfully argued that Jan Jones committed fraud and illegally moved funds to the Cayman Islands, resulting in an order for over $23 million in damages and the seizure of assets. The document includes a Stipulated Confidentiality Order and a subsequent Order on Emergency Writ of Mandamus from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which reinstated the District Court's orders and mandated review by the Department of Treasury and FBI due to the sensitive nature of the government's investigation.
003.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Proceed Anonymously' filed on July 24, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-CV-81092). The plaintiff, identified as 'L.M.', is a 20-year-old female alleging she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein between the ages of 14 and 17. The motion argues that her identity should be protected due to the sensitive nature of the allegations and notes she was previously identified as a victim by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office in a criminal investigation against Epstein.
031.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) moving to dismiss a complaint by plaintiff Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations and that she has failed to prove 'extraordinary circumstances' or a relevant criminal indictment to toll this period. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages are not recoverable against an estate under either New York law (where the alleged torts occurred) or USVI law (where the estate is probated).
014-08.pdf
This document is a declaration by FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater, executed in 2015, detailing his involvement in the 2006-2007 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Slater describes locating and calling a potential victim (whose name is redacted) in early 2007 while accompanied by lead agent Nesbitt E. Kuyrkendall. During the call, the woman confirmed knowing Epstein but refused to cooperate, stating she had moved away to distance herself and wanted to leave the situation in her past.
013.pdf
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
015-01.pdf
This document is a Motion to Stay proceedings filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in a civil case brought by a plaintiff identified as C.M.A. Epstein argues that the civil case should be paused until late 2010, when his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with federal prosecutors expires, to avoid forcing him to waive his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination while facing potential ongoing criminal liability. The filing includes an affidavit from his criminal defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Indictment from 2006 for Felony Solicitation of Prostitution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity