DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
703 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
7
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
703 KB
Summary
This legal document discusses discrimination claims and the application of statutes of limitations. It references previous cases such as Landgraf and Enterprise, and considers the retroactive effect of revised statutes of limitations, particularly in the context of securities fraud claims and child sexual abuse cases involving Maxwell.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
Maxwell's child sexual abuse
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Court |
As the Court explained
|
| Enterprise | Company |
Enterprise does not alter this conclusion
|
Key Quotes (7)
""filed after its enactment, but arising out of events that predate its enactment,""Source
— Unknown
(a case "filed after its enactment, but arising out of events that predate its enactment,")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #1
""[t]he conduct to which the statute of limitations applies is not the primary conduct of the defendants, the alleged discrimination, but is instead the secondary conduct of the plaintiffs, the filing of their suit.""Source
— Court
(As the Court explained, "[t]he conduct to which the statute of limitations applies is not the primary conduct of the defendants, the alleged discrimination, but is instead the secondary conduct of the plaintiffs, the filing of their suit.")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #2
""Landgraf and other cases countenance treating statutes of limitations differently from statutory provisions that affect substantive rights.""Source
— Unknown
(("Landgraf and other cases countenance treating statutes of limitations differently from statutory provisions that affect substantive rights."))
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #3
""impaired no rights possessed by either party, increased neither party's liability, nor imposed any new duties with respect to past transactions.""Source
— Unknown
(2003 amendment "impaired no rights possessed by either party, increased neither party's liability, nor imposed any new duties with respect to past transactions.")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #4
""revive already expired securities fraud claims.""Source
— Unknown
(an amended statute of limitations operated to "revive already expired securities fraud claims.")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #5
""retroactive application of a revised statute of limitations generally does not have an impermissible retroactive effect,""Source
— Unknown
(acknowledging that under Vernon, "retroactive application of a revised statute of limitations generally does not have an impermissible retroactive effect,")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #6
""the resurrection of previously time-barred claims has an impermissible retroactive effect.""Source
— Court
(the Court concluded that "the resurrection of previously time-barred claims has an impermissible retroactive effect.")
DOJ-OGR-00021698.jpg
Quote #7
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document