HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015776.jpg
1.53 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Book excerpt / manuscript page (evidence)
File Size:
1.53 MB
Summary
This document is page 86 of a manuscript or book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', bearing a House Oversight Committee evidence stamp. The text is a philosophical and linguistic discussion about 'background context' in communication and how different languages (English, German, Hebrew, Chinese) structure thought and expression. It uses anecdotes about comedy sketches and linguistic examples to argue that thought processes, particularly for dyslexic engineers, may occur abstractly before being translated into language.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alex | Fictional/Example Character |
Used in an anecdote to explain 'background context' regarding a comedy sketch.
|
| Bella | Fictional/Example Character |
Used in an anecdote to explain 'background context' regarding a comedy sketch.
|
| The Two Ronnies | British Comedy Duo |
Mentioned as the source of a 'learning Swedish sketch' used in an example.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Oxford English Dictionary |
Mentioned as containing foreign loan words like Zeitgeist and Chutzpah.
|
|
| YouTube |
Referenced as a place to watch the comedy sketch.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015776' at the bottom.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"If you are a dyslexic engineer like me, language is a long way down the processing chain."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015776.jpg
Quote #1
"Most scientists believe we think thoughts using language, but most scientists writing about thought are linguists or psychologists."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015776.jpg
Quote #2
"An argument in Chinese can sound quite alarming to the Western ear, with its percussive monosyllables and extreme inflection changes."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015776.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document