DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
830 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
830 KB
Summary
This legal document, page 12 of a court filing from August 11, 2025, discusses the rule of secrecy for grand jury matters as established in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). It outlines the specific, narrow exceptions that permit disclosure to government personnel, other grand juries, and law enforcement, or by court order for judicial proceedings and various government investigations. The document then introduces the 'Special Circumstances' Doctrine, developed by the Second Circuit, which allows for disclosure in cases of unusual historical or public interest, citing several precedent cases.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Biaggi |
Mentioned in the case citation 'In re Biaggi, 478 F.2d at 491–92' and 'In re Biaggi, 478 F.2d at 492–93'.
|
|
| Craig |
Mentioned in the case citation 'In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 101–02'.
|
|
| Garland |
Mentioned as a party in the case citation 'Laws.’ Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland, 43 F.4th'.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case 'United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.'.
|
| Procter & Gamble Co. | company |
Mentioned as a party in the case 'United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.'.
|
| Second Circuit | court |
Mentioned as the court that recognized and developed the 'Special Circumstances' Doctrine.
|
| Laws.' Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. | commission |
Mentioned as a party in the case 'Laws.’ Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland'.
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Appears in the footer document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015144', likely referring to the Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (4 events)
1958
The case of United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681–82 n.2 (1958) is cited.
The case of Laws.’ Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland, 43 F.4th is cited as an example of the 'Special Circumstances' Doctrine.
Second Circuit
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in the case name 'United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.' and the legal citation '356 U.S. 677'.
|
Relationships (2)
Parties in the court case 'United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.'.
Parties in the court case 'Laws.’ Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland'.
Key Quotes (6)
"preliminar[y] to or in connection with a judicial proceeding"Source
— Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i)
(A condition under which a court may authorize disclosure of grand jury matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #1
"at the request of a defendant who shows that a ground may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the grand jury"Source
— Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(ii)
(A condition under which a court may authorize disclosure of grand jury matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #2
"at the request of the government, when sought by a foreign court or prosecutor for use in an official criminal investigation"Source
— Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(iii)
(A condition under which a court may authorize disclosure of grand jury matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #3
"at the request of the government if it shows that the matter may disclose a violation of State, Indian tribal, or foreign criminal law"Source
— Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(iv)
(A condition under which a court may authorize disclosure of grand jury matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #4
"at the request of the government if it shows that the matter may disclose a violation of military criminal law under the Uniform Code of Military Justice"Source
— Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(v)
(A condition under which a court may authorize disclosure of grand jury matters.)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #5
"special circumstances"Source
— Second Circuit
(Describing a doctrine where disclosure of grand jury materials may be appropriate even when not authorized by Rule 6(e).)
DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document