DOJ-OGR-00004794.jpg
626 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
626 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on June 25, 2021, argues that a person named Maxwell has no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding documents produced during a prior civil litigation. It asserts that because a protective order allowed these documents to be widely shared among various parties (attorneys, witnesses, court staff), they were not truly private. The document cites Supreme Court and Second Circuit precedents, such as Carpenter and Andover, to support the position that such information can be used by the Government in a subsequent criminal prosecution.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
Subject of the legal argument, who is claimed to have no reasonable expectation of privacy in documents from a civil ...
|
| Carpenter | Party in a legal case |
Referenced as part of a legal precedent (See Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2219–20) concerning privacy expectations.
|
| Andover | Party in a legal case |
Referenced as part of a legal precedent (See Andover, 876 F.2d at 1083) concerning civil protective orders.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | Judiciary |
Cited for its holding on reasonable expectation of privacy in geographical information from cell phones.
|
| Second Circuit | Judiciary |
Cited for its precedent regarding civil protective orders and their lack of guarantee against use in subsequent crimi...
|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity with which Maxwell's information was shared, to her objection.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A civil litigation in which Maxwell produced documents that were shared with various parties under a protective order.
Maxwell
The parties to the case
Attorneys involved in the case
People employed by or associated with attorneys involved in the case
Expert witnesses
Fact witnesses
Potential witnesses
Court personnel and stenographers
Relationships (1)
The document describes Maxwell objecting to the Government having access to information she shared in a prior civil litigation, indicating a legal conflict.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document