Supreme Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
014.pdf
This document contains a 2019 SDNY Court Order from Judge Richard Berman docketing two exhibits discussed at a bail hearing. The first exhibit is a transcript of a January 18, 2011, SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing in New York State Court, where Epstein was classified as a Level 3 sex offender despite arguments from both the Defense and the Prosecution regarding the specifics of his Florida plea deal and the lack of other indictments. The second exhibit is a financial Asset Summary dated June 30, 2019, detailing Epstein's net worth of approximately $559 million, including cash, equities, hedge funds, and properties in New York, New Mexico, Florida, Paris, and the US Virgin Islands.
038-02.pdf
This document contains Certificates of Good Standing for attorney Christopher John Orrico, filed as an exhibit in Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (related to US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase regarding Epstein). The first certificate verifies his admission to the New York Bar on January 11, 2010, and his good standing as of July 13, 2023. The second certificate verifies his admission to the Connecticut Bar on November 6, 2009, and his good standing as of July 21, 2023.
019-03.pdf
This document is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Court of Maryland for attorney John Marcus McNichols. It certifies that he was admitted to the bar on March 22, 2012, and remains in good standing as of June 27, 2023. The document was filed on June 30, 2023, as an attachment (Document 19-3) in the case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Government of the US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), indicating McNichols' involvement as legal counsel in the Epstein-related litigation.
017.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF). Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in a civil suit brought by Teresa Helm. The filing includes DiRago's affidavit of good standing and certificates from the Supreme Court of Illinois and the Northern District of Illinois confirming her bar status.
015-02.pdf
This document contains two legal certificates filed as part of Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB (Giuffre v. Dershowitz) on February 14, 2020. The first is a Certificate of Admission from the Supreme Court of Illinois certifying that Mary Sharon DiRago has been a licensed attorney in good standing since November 4, 2004. The second is a Certificate of Good Standing from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for the same attorney, dated January 29, 2020.
032-02.pdf
An official Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of the State of Utah, dated February 17, 2017. Interim Clerk Lisa Collins certifies that attorney Paul G. Cassell has been a member of the Utah Bar in good standing since his admission on May 27, 1992. This document was filed as an exhibit in federal case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS on March 13, 2017.
018-02.pdf
This document (18-2) contains two legal certificates filed on February 14, 2020, in Case 1:19-cv-11869-MKV-DCF. The first is a Certificate of Admission from the Supreme Court of Illinois certifying attorney Mary Sharon DiRago is in good standing and was admitted in 2004. The second is a Certificate of Good Standing from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for the same attorney.
029.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 14, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, in the case brought by Jane Doe 1000. The filing includes an affidavit from DiRago and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar.
033.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by attorney Daniel Mullkoff submitted in the case of Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Epstein Estate). The declaration serves to introduce three exhibits into the court record: Epstein's Last Will and Testament (dated Aug 8, 2019), a complaint filed by the US Virgin Islands, and an Affidavit of Service from the case Araoz v. Epstein. The declaration opposes the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the Estate's executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The filing includes her affidavit and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar and the Northern District of Illinois.
EFTA00032633.pdf
This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from September 30, 2020. It covers various legal and political topics, including the first Trump-Biden debate, Supreme Court news involving Amy Coney Barrett, and regulatory updates from the EPA, FERC, and FCC. It lists numerous law firms and companies in the sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green' (a law firm) and 'JPMorgan Chase & Co.', which is noted for a deferred prosecution deal involving compliance technology.
EFTA00031733.pdf
This document is a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom, concerning the extradition of six terrorism suspects (including Abu Hamza) to the United States. The applicants argued that extradition would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the risk of solitary confinement at ADX Florence and the possibility of grossly disproportionate life sentences. The Court unanimously ruled that extradition would not violate Article 3, finding that conditions at ADX Florence and the potential sentences did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
EFTA00031566.pdf
This document is a Property Summary Report dated July 19, 2019, prepared by London & Thurber, LLC regarding the property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY. The report identifies the owner as Maple, Inc. (a U.S. Virgin Islands Corp) and notes a 'Lis Pendens' (pending lawsuit) filed by the United States of America against Jeffrey Epstein on July 11, 2019 (Case No. 19CR490). The property has an estimated market value of over $75 million.
EFTA00026622.pdf
This document is a 'State of the Office' report (likely for 2019 despite the 2018 header) from the Public Corruption Unit of the SDNY. It summarizes significant cases from the year, most notably the sex trafficking charges against Jeffrey Epstein, his subsequent suicide at the MCC, and charges against the guards who failed to monitor him. It also details high-profile cases against Michael Avenatti for extortion and fraud, and Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman for campaign finance violations.
EFTA00026424.pdf
This document is a Bloomberg newsletter from July 7, 2020. It covers various news items including PPP loan controversies, COVID-19 updates, and market news. Significantly, it reports that Ghislaine Maxwell, described as a former Jeffrey Epstein associate, has arrived in New York and is scheduled for a plea hearing on July 14 via videoconference.
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
EFTA00013811.pdf
This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00000147.tif
This legal document addresses discovery disputes in a case involving 'Maxwell.' It details Maxwell's motion to compel the Government to produce various types of evidence, including Jencks Act, Brady, and Giglio material. The Court rules that while Maxwell is not entitled to expedited discovery, the parties must confer on a pretrial disclosure schedule, and the Court accepts the Government's assertion that it has already disclosed all required Brady and Giglio material, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00000134.tif
This document discusses a legal argument regarding the government's delay in bringing charges against 'Maxwell' and whether this delay violated due process. It cites legal precedents from the Supreme Court and other courts. Maxwell argues that the delay prejudiced her defense, specifically mentioning potential witnesses who have died, including Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000132.tif
This document discusses the legislative history and intent behind the PROTECT Act's retroactivity provisions, emphasizing that Congress removed an express retroactivity clause due to constitutional concerns. It cites a Supreme Court case (Stogner v. California) and Senator Leahy's statements to argue that the Act applies to past conduct, like Maxwell's, where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00000127.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal analysis discussing the interpretation of statutory language, specifically § 3283, and the application of 'categorical' versus 'circumstance-specific' approaches in legal contexts. It references several court cases including United States v. Schneider (2015), Weingarten (865 F.3d at 58), United States v. Morgan (2004), and Nijhawan v. Holder (2009), to support the argument that courts should look beyond bare legal charges to the circumstances of an offense, especially when a statute uses the word 'involves'.
DOJ-OGR-00000077.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing or opinion, discussing the application of a statute of limitations (§ 3283) in a case involving Maxwell. It focuses on whether the 2003 amendment to § 3283, which extended the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse and kidnapping offenses, can be applied retroactively to pre-enactment conduct, citing Supreme Court precedent on statutory retroactivity.
DOJ-OGR-00017692.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal discussion between a judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the admissibility of evidence for impeaching a witness named Jane, debating whether the issue falls under Rule 408, and emphasizing the necessity of the witness's personal knowledge. The judge also elaborates on the binding nature of Second Circuit precedent on district courts unless overturned by a higher authority.
DOJ-OGR-00015138.jpg
This legal document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's ongoing appeals process, including a denied petition at the Second Circuit and a pending petition before the Supreme Court as of July 2025, which argues her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's prior non-prosecution agreement. The document also details a February 27, 2025, Department of Justice press release announcing the declassification and public release of files related to Epstein's crimes. The release features quotes from Attorney General Pamela Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, who both promise transparency and accountability.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity