DOJ-OGR-00020906.jpg
613 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
613 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, detailing a discussion between the judge and attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Sternheim, Ms. Moe) about a potential juror. The conversation focuses on the juror's questionnaire answers, his past as a victim of sexual abuse, and his interactions with a journalist named Lucia, questioning his understanding of the public consequences and his ability to be an impartial juror.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaking in court, arguing for follow-up questions for a potential juror regarding the juror's questionnaire answers,...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions, and making decisions about which questions will be posed to a potential...
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaking in court, raising an issue about a potential juror's response regarding following instructions.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking in court, thanking the judge.
|
| Lucia | Journalist |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as a journalist who interviewed a potential juror about the consequences of going public wi...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears in the footer of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-02-28
A court hearing (voir dire) to discuss the suitability of a potential juror, focusing on his questionnaire answers, public statements, and understanding of the consequences of his actions.
Southern District Court (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceedings, as mentioned in the name of the reporting agency in the footer.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, is addressing the judge ('Your Honor') and arguing legal points during a court proceeding.
Ms. Sternheim, an attorney, is addressing the judge ('Judge') to raise an issue during a court proceeding.
Mr. Everdell describes an interview conducted by Lucia, a journalist, with the potential juror.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think we also need some follow-up questions that we proposed in our letter about his belief about victim memory, because I think that goes to his ability to evaluate the evidence fairly and impartially."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing for specific questions to be asked to a potential juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00020906.jpg
Quote #1
"Why was it that he found this interesting? Was it some reflection of the fact that it involved victims of sexual abuse, and because he was the victim of sexual abuse himself that made it interesting for him?"Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the motivation behind a potential juror's comment about finding the case 'interesting'.)
DOJ-OGR-00020906.jpg
Quote #2
"I think the issue is he was saying how he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, to come out, even though he's talking to journalists."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining his understanding of a potential juror's statements about an interview with a journalist named Lucia.)
DOJ-OGR-00020906.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document