Lucia
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed potential juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed male
|
Interview subject journalist |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed male subject
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed male subject
|
Interviewee journalist |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified witness
|
Interview subject journalist |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00020907.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding (dated Feb 28, 2023, Case 22-1426) involving a debate between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Ms. Moe before the Judge. The discussion centers on the credibility of a male witness/victim who gave an interview to a journalist named Lucia from 'The Independent' about sexual abuse. Everdell argues the witness is inconsistent regarding whether he understood that speaking to the press would make his identity and abuse public.
DOJ-OGR-00020906.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, detailing a discussion between the judge and attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Sternheim, Ms. Moe) about a potential juror. The conversation focuses on the juror's questionnaire answers, his past as a victim of sexual abuse, and his interactions with a journalist named Lucia, questioning his understanding of the public consequences and his ability to be an impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010251.jpg
This document is page 36 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures a legal argument regarding the cross-examination of a male witness who is a victim of sexual abuse. The defense (implied) questions the witness about an interview with a reporter named Lucia from The Independent and whether he understood the public consequences of that interview. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to the phrasing of the question regarding 'consequences' as confusing, while conceding no objection to limited follow-up on the witness's understanding of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00010250.jpg
This document is page 35 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. Attorney Mr. Everdell argues before the Court that a male subject (likely a juror or witness) lacks credibility because his statements about not expecting to be known contradict his lengthy discussions with a journalist named Lucia from The Independent about the consequences of coming forward. The defense contends the subject is 'talking out of both sides of his mouth' regarding his anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00010249.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a male subject (likely a juror) gave inconsistent statements regarding his understanding of the publicity consequences of an interview with a journalist named Lucia, specifically in relation to answers provided on a jury questionnaire. Everdell highlights the contradiction of the subject claiming he did not expect to become known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse while simultaneously speaking to journalists.
DOJ-OGR-00010230.jpg
This document is a transcript of legal testimony where an unnamed witness is being questioned about a questionnaire they previously filled out. The witness states they became aware of an inaccurate answer they provided only after an article was published in The Independent. They also specify that they first learned the questionnaire contained a question about sexual abuse history during a separate interview with Daily Mail reporter Laura Collins.
Consequences of the potential juror going public as a vic...
Mr. Everdell describes an interview between journalist Lucia and a potential juror where they discussed the consequences of him going public with his story. The juror allegedly didn't expect to become known worldwide as a victim.
Sexual Abuse
Discussion regarding the subject's sexual abuse and the consequences of coming forward.
Coming forward
A lengthy discussion about the consequences of coming forward to the press.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity