DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg

948 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 948 KB
Summary

This court transcript from February 15, 2012, documents the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who is also a trained lawyer. The questioning centers on her defiance of a court order to appear, having told Judge Pauley's clerk she was not coming, and her rationale for this action which she is unable to explain. The testimony also reveals she was unaware of a potential immunity deal and had met with her apparent counsel, Ms. Sternheim, six times before the hearing.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness
The individual being questioned under direct examination, addressed as Ms. Conrad.
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS Named party in case
Mentioned in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
Judge Pauley United States district judge
The judge who issued a subpoena and court order to the witness, Ms. Conrad.
MR. OKULA Attorney
An attorney present in the courtroom who makes objections during the questioning of Ms. Conrad.
MR. GAIR Attorney
An attorney present in the courtroom who addresses the court regarding an objection.
THE COURT Presiding Judge
The judge presiding over the hearing, who rules on objections.
Ms. Sternheim Counsel
An individual, likely Ms. Conrad's counsel, with whom Ms. Conrad met six times before the court date.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Government agency
The plaintiff in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
University of Chicago University
Mentioned by Ms. Conrad in the phrase "I'm not University of Chicago trained --" and by the questioner who is apparen...
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS Company
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings, mentioned at the bottom of the last page.

Timeline (3 events)

2011-12-20
A subpoena was served on Ms. Conrad in front of Judge Pauley.
Federal courtroom
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
Federal courtroom
Prior to 2012-02-15
Ms. Conrad met with Ms. Sternheim a total of six times.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location of the legal proceedings, as indicated by the case type (United States of America v.) and mention of a U...

Relationships (2)

Conrad Legal Judge Pauley
Judge Pauley issued a subpoena and a court order compelling Ms. Conrad to appear in court.
Conrad Professional Ms. Sternheim
Ms. Conrad met with Ms. Sternheim six times prior to her testimony. The context strongly implies Ms. Sternheim is her legal counsel.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm not coming"
Source
— Conrad (The questioner paraphrasing what Ms. Conrad allegedly told a federal judge regarding her court appearance.)
DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg
Quote #1
"I will not be coming today"
Source
— Conrad (The questioner quoting what Ms. Conrad allegedly told the deputy clerk on the morning of her testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm not University of Chicago trained --"
Source
— Conrad (Ms. Conrad's response when an objection is made to a question about her behavior being irrational.)
DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document