DOJ-OGR-00000566.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, argues before the court about the bail conditions for Mr. Epstein, specifically advocating for the use of a private guard. The speaker cites Second Circuit precedents, including the Esposito case, to argue that such a condition is not discriminatory and is appropriate given that the flight risk arguments are predicated on the defendant's wealth.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the hearing, who was asking about the bail package.
|
| Mr. Weingarten |
Mentioned as having reminded the speaker about a representative from a security company.
|
|
| Judge Bianco | Judge |
Mentioned as a judge who is on one side of a legal debate.
|
| Judge Rakoff | Judge |
Mentioned as a judge who is on the other side of a legal debate from Judge Bianco.
|
| Esposito | Subject of a legal case |
The name of a legal decision cited by the speaker regarding the appropriateness of a private guard.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
His position is being discussed in relation to bail conditions and flight risk arguments based on wealth.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit | Court / Government Agency |
Mentioned as the source of legal decisions being discussed as precedent.
|
| the government | Government Agency |
Mentioned as the entity that would not make certain flight risk arguments for a poor person.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-24
A discussion during a court hearing regarding a bail package, focusing on the condition of using private security guards for a wealthy defendant, Mr. Epstein.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
The speaker is presenting legal arguments to the judge, addressing them as 'your Honor'.
The document states they are on opposite sides of a legal debate.
Key Quotes (2)
"So there isn't this kind of invidious discrimination between somebody who is poor and someone who is wealthy because if a person is poor, even someone in Mr. Epstein's position, the government would not be making the same kind of flight arguments that are predicated upon his wealth."Source
— Unidentified Speaker
(Arguing that using a defendant's wealth to justify private security as a bail condition is not discriminatory.)
DOJ-OGR-00000566.jpg
Quote #1
"The most recent one actually is the Esposito decision where the court says that a private guard in that case is appropriate because he wouldn't be a flight risk but for his wealth."Source
— Unidentified Speaker
(Citing a legal precedent from the Second Circuit to support the argument for allowing a private guard as a bail condition.)
DOJ-OGR-00000566.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document