MR. WEINGARTEN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Fernich
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
his client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A discussion in court regarding a motion to dismiss an indictment based on a nolle prosequi order... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where a protective order was discussed and defense counsel began to address th... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A lawyer presents arguments for Mr. Epstein's home detention. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A discussion during a court hearing regarding a bail package, focusing on the condition of using ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail and detention for Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Mr. Weingarten is providing context about a prior investigation. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A discussion in court regarding a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) from the Southern District of Fl... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A court hearing was held to discuss pretrial matters related to Mr. Epstein, including a pretrial... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Detention Hearing proceedings where defense requests adjournment to prepare bail package. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A hearing to determine if the defendant should be detained pending trial. | Court | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court Hearing (Bond Hearing) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Argument | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court hearing (likely bail hearing or arraignment) regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court hearing regarding obstruction discussions and scheduling of bail application. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Detention Hearing / Court Proceeding | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A pretrial detention hearing where the government presented arguments for detaining the defendant... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-11 | Court hearing | The continuation of a detention hearing is scheduled for Thursday, July 11, at 2 p.m. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000668.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mr. Edwards addresses the court regarding his clients (victims) who wish to speak, establishing protocols for those who wish to remain anonymous ('Jane Doe'). Edwards also acknowledges presentations made by attorneys Weingarten and Weinberg, expressing professional respect for Weinberg despite the adversarial nature of the case, and references the 'tragic ending' (Epstein's death) in relation to potential civil rights violations.
DOJ-OGR-00000657.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019. It captures a dialogue between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Weingarten, regarding the government's motion to dismiss an indictment. Mr. Weingarten clarifies that while his clients want the court to investigate the underlying events, they ultimately support the motion to dismiss the indictment itself.
DOJ-OGR-00000655.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where a lawyer, Mr. Weingarten, argues that the court has the authority and public duty to investigate the death of his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Weingarten emphasizes the intense public interest and conspiracy theories surrounding the death, and specifically references a prior incident on July 23, 2019, described as an alleged attempted suicide, as a matter the court had already shown interest in.
DOJ-OGR-00000652.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten addresses the court regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that prison employees falsified information and ignored orders never to leave Epstein alone. Weingarten states that despite the medical examiner's conclusion of suicide by hanging, the defense has received medical evidence suggesting the injuries were more consistent with assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000651.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, detailing a conversation between the court, Ms. Comey, and defense counsel Mr. Weingarten. After confirming a protective order is self-executing, Mr. Weingarten begins to address the court about recent, serious events concerning his client's incarceration, referencing public statements by the Attorney General about "improprieties in the jail" and the subsequent removal of the warden and suspension of guards.
DOJ-OGR-00000566.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, argues before the court about the bail conditions for Mr. Epstein, specifically advocating for the use of a private guard. The speaker cites Second Circuit precedents, including the Esposito case, to argue that such a condition is not discriminatory and is appropriate given that the flight risk arguments are predicated on the defendant's wealth.
DOJ-OGR-00000564.jpg
This document is page 54 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues for Epstein's release on bail, citing high-profile defendants like Madoff and Skilling who honored their bail conditions and surrendered for prison. The Judge asks if those precedents involved a 'presumption' of detention, which Weinberg admits they may not have, but argues that Epstein's 14-year history of non-danger negates that presumption.
DOJ-OGR-00000558.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in which a defense lawyer argues for home detention for their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer outlines a series of strict proposed conditions, including a visitor list limited to the legal team, removal of cell phones, and consent to monitoring and searches. To support the argument, the lawyer cites a precedent from a 20-year-old organized crime case they argued before Former Chief Judge Mark Wolf.
DOJ-OGR-00000429.jpg
This court transcript, filed on July 16, 2019, documents a judge scheduling a continued detention hearing for a defendant, Mr. Epstein, on July 11. The court orders Mr. Epstein to remain detained and directs him and his counsel, Mr. Weingarten, to see Judge Berman in courtroom 17B immediately. The transcript also includes a clarification from Mr. Weingarten that there is no statutory rape charge due to a lack of penetration.
DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
A transcript page from a July 16, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Prosecutor Rossmiller argues that the previous non-prosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida and that current charges involve New York victims, distinct from previous conduct. The Judge interrupts to object to the minimization of 'statutory rape' with the word 'only'.
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of a detention hearing until Thursday, which the Court grants. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller accepts the delay but provides a rebuttal argument, asserting that federal law charges trafficking rather than 'child prostitution' because children cannot consent to sex, and noting that force is not required for underage victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000424.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of the detention hearing to the end of the week to prepare a written bail package, noting they had just met the client that day. The government attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, does not object, provided the defendant consents to detention in the interim under statute 3142(f).
DOJ-OGR-00000422.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on July 16, 2019, concerning a bond hearing. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that while there may have been prostitution, there was no violence, coercion, or trafficking involved. The Judge (The Court) counters this argument by noting that if the women involved were under 18, they were legally incapable of consent, making the acts rape.
DOJ-OGR-00000420.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on July 16, 2019. Attorney Mr. Weingarten argues before the Court that the Florida nonprosecution agreement should stand, asserting that a plea deal cannot be undone simply because prosecutors failed to notify victims, provided the defendant fulfilled their obligations (prison time, restitution, registration). Weingarten emphasizes that voiding such deals would make it impossible for defense attorneys to negotiate future agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00000419.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 16, 2019, capturing a dialogue between Mr. Weingarten and the Court. The discussion centers on a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) from the Southern District of Florida, referencing a prior ruling by Judge Marra who found that prosecutors failed to properly notify victims about the deal. The Court also inquires about the geographic limitations of such agreements, a point Mr. Weingarten identifies as a key issue for future pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00000417.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 16, 2019, where an attorney, Mr. Weingarten, provides context to the court about a prior investigation into Mr. Epstein. He describes a three-year investigation that began in Florida in 2005, involving both local and federal law enforcement, concerning allegations of prostitution. Mr. Weingarten claims that a significant portion of local law enforcement viewed the case as simple prostitution without coercion, while federal authorities held a 'contrary view,' leading to complex negotiations.
DOJ-OGR-00000416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, detailing a pretrial detention hearing. A government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, argues for the defendant's detention by describing evidence found at his home, including a massage room consistent with victim accounts and electronic disks labeled with incriminating titles. Mr. Rossmiller concludes that the defendant represents a continuing danger to the community and a flight risk, justifying detention pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000410.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a detention hearing on July 16, 2019. The government's attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained without bail pending trial, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger. The argument is based on serious charges, including a years-long scheme of trafficking and sexually abusing minors, and is supported by a recommendation for detention from Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00000409.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, detailing the arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). During this proceeding, the Court reads the charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking to Epstein. Represented by Mr. Weingarten, Epstein pleads 'Not guilty' to the charges, and the Court moves the proceedings toward the question of bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019. The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorneys (Weingarten and Weinberg), and the prosecutor (Rossmiller) regarding the scheduling of a bail application hearing, moving it from Thursday to the following Monday at 10:00 AM. The prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, requests a moment to confer with the defense and subsequently states that the government will rely on its initial submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000400.jpg
This is page 14 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case of USA v. Epstein. The judge asks the prosecution (Mr. Rossmiller) if other defendants are anticipated; Rossmiller replies that no superseding indictments are imminent but are possible. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten then argues against current obstruction allegations by citing historical negotiations from 2007-2008, where federal and defense lawyers settled on a state statute plea deal rather than federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000399.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on July 16, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The discussion centers on pretrial matters for a Mr. Epstein, including clarification that he has one effective passport and a debate over whether a pretrial report indicates he refused to provide financial information or was simply incomplete. The judge also questions another attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, about allegations of witness tampering by Mr. Epstein, confirming these will be part of the government's bail submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that discovery is needed to determine if Florida prosecutors violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by steering victims to New York. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller responds that the conduct is within the statute of limitations and denies allegations of a conspiracy within the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00000390.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The court discusses a search conducted at Epstein's East 71st Street residence over the previous weekend and questions the impact of discovered materials on his sex offender status. Prosecutor Rossmiller describes the materials as 'extremely concerning' regarding bail, while defense attorney Weingarten notes they have not yet seen the 'pictures' in question.
Epstein's cause of death and prison conduct
Discussion regarding allegations of prison staff negligence/falsification and disputing the medical examiner's finding of suicide.
Court's authority to investigate Jeffrey Epstein's death
Mr. Weingarten argues that the court has the inherent authority and a public interest mandate to investigate the circumstances of Jeffrey Epstein's death, including a prior incident on July 23, 2019, which he refers to as an alleged attempted suicide.
Obstruction allegations history
Weingarten explains the history of negotiations in 2007-2008 regarding state vs federal statutes.
Pretrial litigation arguments
Argument regarding the finality of plea deals/nonprosecution agreements even if prosecutors fail to notify victims.
Context of a 2005 Florida investigation into Mr. Epstein
Mr. Weingarten describes a past three-year investigation in Florida into Mr. Epstein, noting that some local law enforcement viewed the matter as simple prostitution, while federal authorities held a contrary view.
Florida Nonprosecution Agreement (NPA)
A dialogue between Mr. Weingarten and the Court regarding a nonprosecution agreement from the Southern District of Florida. They discuss a prior ruling by Judge Marra that prosecutors failed to notify victims, and the potential geographic scope of such agreements.
Florida Nonprosecution Agreement (NPA)
A dialogue between Mr. Weingarten and the Court regarding a nonprosecution agreement from the Southern District of Florida. They discuss a prior ruling by Judge Marra that prosecutors failed to notify victims, and the potential geographic scope of such agreements.
Request for adjournment to prepare bail package
Weingarten requests time to review government submission and prepare a coherent bail package in writing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity