DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg

701 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal opinion (page 18 of 21)
File Size: 701 KB
Summary

This page is from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely *US v. Maxwell*) denying the Defendant's request to subpoena social media companies for Juror 50's communications. The Court rules that the request is a 'fishing expedition' and procedurally improper under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which generally prohibits private parties (like the Defendant) from subpoenaing content from providers like Facebook or Instagram; only the Government may do so with a warrant.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Referenced as the party requesting subpoenas and communications regarding Juror 50. (Note: Case number 1:20-cr-00330-...
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of the Defendant's inquiry regarding potential bias, questionnaire answers, and post-trial interviews.
Wayne LaFave Author/Legal Scholar
Cited in 'Criminal Procedure' regarding the Stored Communications Act.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Social media companies
Targets of the Defendant's requested subpoenas.
Microsoft Corp.
Cited in a legal precedent (Matter of Warrant...).
Facebook
Cited in legal precedent and explicitly mentioned as a platform the defendant cannot subpoena directly.
Instagram
Explicitly mentioned as a platform the defendant cannot subpoena directly.
The Government
The prosecution; noted as the only party allowed to request disclosure under the SCA.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-02-25
Filing of Document 620
Court
The Court
Before the trial
Voir dire (jury selection process).
Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Western District of New York (cited in United States v. Nix).
District of Columbia (cited in Facebook, Inc. v. Wint).

Relationships (2)

The Defendant Adversarial/Legal Inquiry Juror 50
Defendant is requesting subpoenas regarding Juror 50's communications to prove bias.
The Government Opposing Parties The Defendant
Text mentions 'Government raised the Act in its briefing' opposing the Defendant's requests.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court will not grant the Defendant “the opportunity to ‘conduct a fishing expedition.’”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg
Quote #1
"Those requests for social media content are subject to the Stored Communications Act... which requires an additional factual showing for the Court to order disclosure"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg
Quote #2
"And only the Government, not private parties like the Defendant, may request disclosure pursuant to the Act."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg
Quote #3
"[SCA] does not permit a defendant in a criminal case to subpoena the content of a Facebook or Instagram account."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009559.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document