This document is an Affidavit of Service dated July 28, 2025, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America. It certifies that Robyn Dorsey Willis of Wilson-Epes Printing Co. served three copies of Maxwell's 'Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari' to Solicitor General D. John Sauer at the Department of Justice. Electronic copies were also sent to the DOJ and David Markus (Maxwell's attorney).
This document is a legal motion filed on December 20, 2022, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). They are moving to withdraw a previous motion for attorneys' fees because a resolution was reached in a related case (Govt of USVI v. Epstein Estate et al., ST-2020-CV-00014). The document includes a certificate of service listing government officials and attorneys served with this motion.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between a federal investigator and a witness in the Epstein investigation. The investigator informs the witness they are an 'important witness' and issues a Grand Jury Subpoena for New York, while offering a video conference as an alternative to appearing in person. The witness expresses concern about traveling to NYC due to Covid-19 and asks if they can instead meet with the FBI in Washington, D.C.
An email chain from January 2021 between federal investigators and a witness. The investigators issue a Grand Jury Subpoena to the individual, describing them as an 'important witness' to the investigation. Due to COVID-19 concerns and the witness's reluctance to travel to the NYC Grand Jury (asking instead to meet the FBI in DC), the parties agree to conduct a video interview, which is scheduled for early February 2021.
This document is an email chain from November 2, 2020, involving the FBI, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), and the Civil Rights Division (CRT). The correspondence coordinates a 'Briefing Conference Call' regarding a 'Survivor_Briefing_Invitees_ODAG_Master_List.xlsx'. The emails discuss an RSVP tracking spreadsheet that includes travel information for attendees, likely related to a briefing for survivors of crimes related to the investigation.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated December 12, 2018, sent to a redacted recipient. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the conviction of an ex-FDIC staffer, the sentencing of SUNY Polytechnic's president, bribery charges against Bloomberg/Turner executives, and updates on Paul Manafort, Huawei, and Stormy Daniels. The document lists numerous law firms and companies in its sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green', which likely triggered its inclusion in Epstein-related searches, though it refers to a law firm, not Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email thread from July 22, 2020, between officials at the USAEO, SDNY, and DOJ regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Ghislaine Maxwell's mugshot. The officials discuss whether the photo exists and is releasable, with SDNY confirming they did not possess the photo at that time but expected to receive it soon for discovery production. They also discuss the protocol for handling such FOIA inquiries, including forwarding them to a specific point of contact.
An email dated July 15, 2019, from Esther Goldschlager, a law school graduate based in D.C., to an unnamed prosecutor (likely involved in the Epstein case). The email expresses gratitude for the recipient's meaningful work on the recent Epstein case developments.
An email chain from July 22, 2020, involving DOJ and USAEO staff discussing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Ghislaine Maxwell's mugshot. The correspondence clarifies that the Southern District of New York (SDNY) does not possess the mugshot and discusses the procedure for handling such inquiries. The initial sender from the FOIA/PA staff in D.C. notes that the photo is not circulating on the internet and seeks verification of its existence and releasability.
This document is an email from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) on August 6, 2020, attaching a draft report concerning the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008 for review. The email includes names of redacted individuals from both organizations and mentions an AUSA in the CC.
The document consists of a drafted letter from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to 'Alex' (likely U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and a handwritten note. The letter aggressively argues against federal prosecution, alleging misconduct by prosecutors David Weinstein and Marie Villafana, including leaks to the press (NYT, Palm Beach Post) and breaches of the U.S. Attorneys Manual. It references Ken Starr's outrage and argues that sex trafficking statutes are 'patently unfair' to Epstein, pushing for a resolution that avoids federal charges.
This document is an Affidavit of Service from Wilson-Epes Printing Co., Inc., certifying that on July 28, 2025, three copies of the 'REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI' in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA Sealed Defendant 1) vs. United States of America were served. The service was made to D. John Sauer, Solicitor General for the U.S. Department of Justice, and electronically to two email addresses. The affidavit was sworn to and subscribed before Notary Public Aza Salinder Donner.
This document is a flight log page signed by pilot David Rodgers for aircraft N908JE covering flights between March 31 and May 13, 1992. The log details numerous flights between locations including Teterboro (TEB), Columbus (CMH), West Palm Beach (PBI), Boston (BOS), and Key West (EYW). The column containing remarks and potential passenger names is completely redacted.
This legal document is a court filing from February 25, 2022, detailing the court's denial of a defendant's request to subpoena social media companies for the communications of 'Juror 50'. The court rules the request is a speculative "fishing expedition" and is procedurally improper under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which does not permit a defendant in a criminal case to subpoena such content directly from providers like Facebook or Instagram.
This page is from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely *US v. Maxwell*) denying the Defendant's request to subpoena social media companies for Juror 50's communications. The Court rules that the request is a 'fishing expedition' and procedurally improper under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which generally prohibits private parties (like the Defendant) from subpoenaing content from providers like Facebook or Instagram; only the Government may do so with a warrant.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 362) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 20, 2021. The text argues for public access to the jury selection process (voir dire) and juror questionnaires, citing numerous legal precedents including United States v. Shkreli and Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court. It asserts that First Amendment rights require these proceedings and documents to be presumptively open to the press and public.
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
An email from Nicholas Ribis to Jeffrey Epstein dated August 11, 2017, forwarding a news article about the Mueller investigation. The article details Paul Manafort's legal troubles, including an FBI raid on his home, pressure to cooperate regarding Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian lawyer, and investigations into money laundering involving his business associates and son-in-law.
This is a letter dated August 19, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the DOJ's Office of Information Policy, appealing on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein regarding the FBI's slow processing of a FOIA request. Weinberg argues that the FBI is failing to meet its statutory obligations, noting that only two batches of documents have been produced in over two years from a file exceeding 12,000 pages, and projecting that at the current pace, the file won't be fully processed until 2025. The letter references previous correspondence with FBI Liaison Dennis Argall and requests the OIP to compel the FBI to comply promptly.
This document is page 3 of a printed Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains a statement from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, defending the non-prosecution agreement/plea deal as 'fairly negotiated' and reviewed by senior DOJ officials, while asserting Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations for over 10 years.
This document is an email circulating a news article from AmLaw Litigation Daily dated August 14, 2016. The article details a legal victory by Latham & Watkins partners Kathryn Ruemmler, Daniel Schecter, and Dean Dunlavey, who successfully defended Dubai-based Emirates NBD Bank against a trade secrets lawsuit brought by InfoSpan Inc. and represented by Boies, Schiller & Flexner. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production.
This document appears to be page 108 of a larger manuscript or report produced during House Oversight proceedings. It contains a narrative recounting a meeting in Washington, Connecticut, featuring physicist David Kaiser. Kaiser discusses the evolution of 'information' from the Cold War era of Norbert Wiener (where it was viewed like entropy) to the modern era where it is commodified and monetized, questioning if new metaphors are needed for the current information landscape.
A page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on context) recounting his time as a Supreme Court clerk for Justice Arthur Goldberg during the JFK assassination in 1963. The text details the moment the court learned of the shooting, the narrator driving Goldberg to the White House to advise LBJ, a tense encounter with a guard over a toy gun, and Goldberg's private explanation of the political motivations behind the formation of the Warren Commission. The document suggests LBJ believed in a conspiracy but used the commission to push the 'lone gunman' theory for national security reasons.
A page from a manuscript (likely a memoir draft) titled 'My Year of Clerking For Justice Goldberg.' It details the narrator's (historically Alan Dershowitz) experience clerking for Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg starting in the summer of 1963. The text contrasts Goldberg's active past as Secretary of Labor with the solitary nature of the Supreme Court and outlines his agenda to abolish the death penalty.
This document is a log of text messages from March 6, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss a meeting in D.C. involving 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) and 'Trump' on the 20th or 21st, shifting the topic of discussion from 'war' to 'Cyber,' which the respondent notes 'Israel [is] best at.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity