HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017684.jpg
2.04 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / house oversight production / law review excerpt
File Size:
2.04 MB
Summary
This document is page 49 of a larger 78-page filing produced to the House Oversight Committee, bearing the name of attorney David Schoen. It contains an excerpt from the 2007 Utah Law Review proposing or discussing legal rules related to sentencing recommendations, specifically emphasizing the rights of victims to object to presentence reports and participate in sentencing hearings. The text outlines procedural steps for objections, the role of probation officers, and court determinations.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney / Submitter |
Name appears at the bottom of the document, likely indicating he submitted this document or is the subject of the file.
|
| Cassell | Legal Scholar / Author |
Referenced in footnote 392 regarding 'Proposed Amendments' to sentencing rules.
|
| Probation Officer | Legal Official |
Mentioned throughout the text regarding their role in the presentence report and handling objections.
|
| The Victim | Party in Legal Proceedings |
The text focuses heavily on the rights of the victim to object to reports and participate in sentencing.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Utah Law Review |
Source of the legal text (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in the citation 'Utah L. Rev.'.
|
Relationships (1)
Schoen's name appears on a document stamped with House Oversight Bates numbering.
Key Quotes (3)
"I further recommended that victims be given the opportunity to object to and be heard on disputed issues in the presentence report"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017684.jpg
Quote #1
"The attorney for the government or for the victim shall raise for the victim any reasonable objection by the victim to the presentence report."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017684.jpg
Quote #2
"This rule was amended in December 2006... to conform with the new, post-Booker regime."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017684.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document