DOJ-OGR-00020818.jpg

650 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 650 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, discusses the court's reasoning for why the sex trafficking charges against Maxwell are not time-barred. The court argues that U.S. Code § 3299 applies retroactively to offenses where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, citing several other district court decisions. The document also addresses Maxwell's motion to dismiss certain counts as multiplicitous, concluding that such a motion is premature at the pretrial stage.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout as the subject of legal motions regarding limitations periods and multiplicitous charges.
Nader Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Nader'.
Pierre-Louis Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Pierre-Louis'.
Vickers Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Vickers'.
Sensi Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Sensi'.
Josephberg Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Josephberg'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
United States Government agency
Party in several cited legal cases, such as 'United States v. Nader'.

Timeline (3 events)

2006
Enactment of § 3299.
2021-04-16
The Court issued an Opinion & Order.
The Court
Maxwell filed a motion to dismiss count five and either count one or count three as multiplicitous.

Locations (4)

Location Context
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Nader' case citation.
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Pierre-Louis' case citation.
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Vickers' case citation.
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Sensi' case citation.

Relationships (1)

Maxwell Legal (Adversarial) United States
The document details legal arguments between Maxwell (the defendant) and the Government (the prosecution) in a criminal case.

Key Quotes (1)

"other law[s]"
Source
— Unknown (Used to describe laws of limitation that would otherwise bar prosecution for certain offenses.)
DOJ-OGR-00020818.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document