DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg

674 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 674 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.

People (5)

Name Role Context
David Juror
A juror who is quoted throughout the document, sharing his perspective on the trial, the victims' credibility, and th...
Epstein
Mentioned in the context of questions about why the victims kept going back to him and Maxwell.
Maxwell
Mentioned alongside Epstein in the context of questions about why the victims kept going back to them.
Carolyn Accuser
An alias for an accuser who testified and became distressed during questioning.
Elizabeth Loftus Professor / Memory expert
A memory expert for the defence team who testified about experiments on implanting false memories.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
The Independent Media
A publication to which the juror, David, told his story.

Timeline (3 events)

An accuser testifying under the name "Carolyn" became distressed during questioning by the defense.
Courtroom
Carolyn defence team
Professor Elizabeth Loftus, a memory expert for the defense, testified about experiments on implanting false memories.
Courtroom
The jury discussed the case, including why victims returned to Epstein and Maxwell, and ultimately found the victims credible.
Jury room
David jury

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the place that went silent when David shared his story.

Relationships (2)

Epstein Association Maxwell
Mentioned together in the context of victims returning to them for help, implying a partnership or close association.
David Juror-Witness Carolyn
David, a juror, observed the testimony of Carolyn, an accuser, and felt compassion for her when she became distressed.

Key Quotes (3)

"We are not here to judge these victims. We are here to judge whether we believe their stories, but we are not here to judge the decisions they made or didn't make."
Source
— David (Said to The Independent, explaining the jury's role in evaluating the victims' testimonies.)
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
Quote #1
"We cannot judge what they did or didn't do afterward. It doesn't change that it happened."
Source
— David (Further explaining his view that the victims' subsequent actions did not invalidate their initial trauma.)
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
Quote #2
"It just made me feel more compassion for her."
Source
— David (His reaction to seeing the accuser "Carolyn" become distressed on the stand during questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document