DOJ-OGR-00002330(1).jpg
708 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
708 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, argues that the jury selection process in the White Plains Division systematically excludes Black and Hispanic jurors. It relies on a statistical analysis by Mr. Martin, which found that the demographic makeup of the jury wheel deviates by more than three standard deviations from comparison populations, suggesting the discrepancy is inherent to the process and not a result of chance.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Martin |
Conducted statistical analyses (comparative disparity and standard deviation) on jury selection, finding significant ...
|
|
| Jackman |
Cited in a legal case (Jackman, 46 F.3d at 1248) related to fair cross-section violations due to systematic exclusion.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York | government agency |
The federal judicial district where the jury selection process is being analyzed.
|
Timeline (1 events)
A statistical analysis of jury selection in the White Plains Division found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors, with a divergence of more than three standard deviations from the comparison population.
White Plains Division
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A division within the Southern District of New York used as a point of comparison for jury population demographics.
|
|
|
The division whose jury selection process is under scrutiny for underrepresenting Black and Hispanic jurors.
|
|
|
Area where eligible jurors were systematically excluded from the jury pool.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"inherent in the particular jury-selection process utilized."Source
— Duren, 439 U.S. at 366
(A quote from a legal precedent defining the nature of a discrepancy that indicates systematic exclusion in jury selection.)
DOJ-OGR-00002330(1).jpg
Quote #1
"not the result of random factors, chance, or luck"Source
— Mr. Martin (inferred from context)
(Describing the findings of the statistical analysis, indicating the underrepresentation of certain groups was not accidental.)
DOJ-OGR-00002330(1).jpg
Quote #2
"the result of a systematic process that under represents” each group."Source
— Mr. Martin (inferred from context)
(The conclusion of the analysis, attributing the demographic disparities in the jury pool to a flawed system.)
DOJ-OGR-00002330(1).jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document