| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
Scheduling Order issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, coordinating deadlines for multiple civil lawsuits against the Epstein Estate (Indyke et al.) and Nine East 71st Street. The order establishes deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, fact discovery (June 10, 2020), and expert discovery (July 31, 2020), and notes ongoing settlement discussions with a status report due by April 30, 2020. The document lists 13 separate civil actions being managed together under this order.
A formal notice filed on July 29, 2021, by Assistant United States Attorney Jessica Lonergan to Judge Analisa Torres in the case of United States v. Tova Noel et al. Lonergan informs the court that she is leaving the U.S. Attorney's Office for other employment and requests to be removed as counsel of record for the prosecution.
This is a court filing dated December 16, 2019, from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Analisa Torres regarding the case 'United States v. Noel and Thomas' (the case against the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's death). The prosecutors are submitting a proposed protective order with the consent of the defense counsel. The letter is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Rebekah Donaleski, Nicolas Roos, and Jessica Lonergan on behalf of US Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman.
This document is a legal reply brief filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States, dated July 28, 2025. The brief argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, which promised not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators' in 'the United States,' should legally bind other districts like the Southern District of New York. The filing highlights a circuit split on whether US Attorneys can bind other districts and contends that the Second Circuit's decision allowing Maxwell's prosecution violates contract law and the plain text of the agreement.
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
Ghislaine Maxwell, appearing pro-se, responds to the Defendants' (Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and executors) motion to dismiss her case for failure to prosecute. She argues that she has complied with court orders despite the constraints of incarceration and seeks indemnification for legal expenses based on Virgin Islands common law, corporate law, and the NES LLC operating agreement. She asserts that public policy and the "unclean hands" of the executors should not bar her claims.
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
This document is a motion filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards. Edwards requests permission to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served by Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion explains that the extra length is necessary to address allegations made by Maxwell regarding Edwards' prior filings and alleged discovery withholding by his client, Virginia Giuffre.
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The document lists numerous civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (Epstein's estate executors) by various victims (Does, Farmer, Helm, etc.). The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order lists numerous civil cases brought by victims (many under pseudonyms like Jane Doe, Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe) against Indyke (Epstein's estate executor) and other entities. The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
An email chain from June 2022 in which an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York contacts a law enforcement partner. The attorney is gathering personal information (DOB, SSN, GS scale) to include the partner in a nomination for a DOJ Director's Award for 'Superior Performance by a Litigation Team' regarding the Epstein / Maxwell case, specifically citing efforts with victims.
An email dated October 23, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to an FBI contact regarding the jury selection schedule for an upcoming trial (likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, given the date and Judge Nathan's name). The email attaches a court order summarizing what Judge Nathan reviewed during a recent conference.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding security logistics for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. An Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York corresponds with a recipient named Eric to coordinate an 'Approved List' of individuals—including FBI agents and witnesses—permitted to use the '40 Foley Bridge' for access to the courthouse during jury selection and hearings.
An email thread from September 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney for the SDNY and an external party regarding a 'photo sourcing project' for trial preparation (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the date). The respondent confirms the project is complete and attaches a spreadsheet titled 'Photos_for_Trial_Prep_with_Location_Info.xlsx', noting the addition of columns for Evidence Item numbers and CD names.
An email dated October 7, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York regarding the preparation of '3500 materials' (Jencks Act disclosures). The sender is seeking missing handwritten notes for two specific interviews conducted in August 2006. The document is stamped with Bates number EFTA00038839.
This document is an email chain from January 28 to February 1, 2020, between Jill Greenfield (Partner at Fieldfisher in London) and a redacted Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield is representing a client who is a victim of sexual assault in the UK and is asserting her client's right to anonymity under UK statute while coordinating a potential interview with US authorities. The thread includes FBI agent Amanda N. Young and USANYS prosecutor Alison Moe in the correspondence to schedule a call regarding the Epstein investigation.
This document is an email dated September 15, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Andrew [Redacted] to an FBI agent. The email requests the FBI agent to serve a subpoena on a specific female court reporter who recorded a sworn statement (likely dated November 25, 2005, based on the attachment filename). The prosecution seeks to contact the reporter to admit parts of that statement into evidence.
This document is an internal FBI email chain and travel authorization request (EAN) dated March 8, 2021. It details a request by an FBI Special Agent and a Task Force Officer from the New York Field Office to travel to Durango, Colorado, from March 17-19, 2021. The purpose of the trip was to conduct an in-person interview with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in preparation for Maxwell's trial.
This document is an email chain from September 2019 between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and another party regarding the Epstein investigation. They discuss logistics for an upcoming interview on October 11th, checking seized photos for date stamps, and ensuring specific individuals are in the Victim Notification System (VNS). Significantly, there is a request for a summary analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's flight records to check for overlaps, with the AUSA noting that available manifests from the 'previous case' might only cover international flights and may not extend back to the 1990s.
An email dated September 23, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The sender requests a phone call to discuss a witness associated with an attached FD-302 interview report dated April 10, 2020.
An email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) dated July 6, 2020, discussing the logistics of property transported with Ghislaine Maxwell. While her personal effects (clothes, jewelry, phone) were released to her defense counsel, the US Marshals requested that specific security footage from the local jail where she was held be picked up from 500 Pearl Street and stored in files, as the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) refused to keep it.
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, sent by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email subject is 'Draft SW' (Search Warrant) and includes an attachment titled 'New_Hampshire_Premises_SW_Affidavit.docx'. The date coincides with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity